摘要
全球化背景下的酷儿研究主要有两种视角:一种是丹尼斯·奥尔特曼提出的"全球酷儿化"观点,强调跨时空的超稳定结构与同一性;另一种是福柯式话语分析,强调内在特殊的身份与类型。跨国同性恋身份和主体性涉及本土性与植入性之争以及第三世界的同性恋群体在面对西方性话语和性实践时如何自我表达的问题。西方与非西方之间的同性恋关系并不是平面化、单向度的,而是具有多元性和异质性,西方并非同性恋身份/文化的原点,亚洲和中国的同性恋也非西方的镜像和拷贝,同性恋研究应避免简单的"刺激-反应"身份生成模式。
There are two perspectives in queer studies against the background of globalization： one is Dennis Ahman＇ s argument of ＂global queering＂, which emphasizes the uhrastable structure and unitarity beyond time and space; the other is Foucauldian discourse analysis, which emphasizes the internal special identity and category. Transnational homosexual identity and subjectivity involve the controversy over localness and embeddedness as well as the ways of self-expression by the third world homosexual community when fa- cing Western sexual discourses and practices. The relationship between the West and the non-Western world does not find expression in planarization or a single dimension, but in diversity and heterogeneity. The West is not the only origin of homosexual identity/culture, and Asian and Chinese lesbians and gays are not the mirror or copy of their Western counterparts. Homosexual studies should avoid the simple identity-creating model of ＂stimulus-response＂.
出处
《云南民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期74-82,共9页
Journal of Yunnan Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目"同性恋者生存现状研究"(项目编号:13CSH082)阶段成果
关键词
全球酷儿化
身份政治
同性恋亚文化
global queering
identity politics
homosexual subculture
