期刊文献+

异质性企业社会责任的“前门”机制和“后门”机制——来自中国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:2

The “Front Door” mechanism and the “Back Door” mechanism of heterogeneous corporate social responsibilities: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于CSR领域中的研究悖论和实践难题,针对利益相关者重要性理论在中国情境下应用的局限性,引入生态系统理论和风险管理理论,构建了一个异质性CSR通过协同降低异质性风险从而提升企业财务绩效的理论模型。并以2007—2013年沪深两市A股上市公司数据为样本对该模型进行了检验,结论表明,慈善型CSR只通过"前门"机制影响财务绩效;而商业型CSR以及异质性CSR的协同作用可以通过"前门"机制和"后门"机制同时影响财务绩效。 Drawing on the limitations of stakeholder salience theory in Chinese context, we introduce both ecosystem theory and risk management theory to build a theoretical model for heterogeneous corporate social responsibilities (CSR) to improve corporate financial performance by synergistically alleviating idiosyncratic risk. Taking a sample of some listed companies in China from 2007 to 2013, we empirically test the model and reach the following conclusions: while philanthropic CSR affects CFP through a ‘‘Front Door’’ mechanism, business practice CSR and their synergistic effect affect CFP not only through a ‘‘Front Door’’ mechanism but also through a ‘‘Back Door’’ mechanism. In line with the conclusions, we propose a new idea to disengage the paradox of CSR research and to solve the problem of CSR in practice.
作者 田虹 王汉瑛
机构地区 吉林大学商学院
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第1期114-122,共9页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"基于质量安全的农产品伤害危机修复策略研究"(15BGL086) 国家社会科学基金项目"媒体类网络公司社会责任研究"(10BGL005) 教育部人文社会科学项目"中国企业社会责任意识 行为与企业绩效研究"(09YJA630047)
关键词 商业型CSR 慈善型CSR 异质性风险 企业财务绩效 business practice CSR philanthropic CSR idiosyncratic risk corporate financial performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Amaeshi K. Different markets for different folks: Exploring thechallenges of mainstreaming responsible investment practices [J].Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 92(1): 41–56. 被引量:1
  • 2Aguinis H, Glavas A. What we know and don't know aboutcorporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda [J].Journal of Management, 2012(4): 932-968. 被引量:1
  • 3Story J, Neves P. When corporate social responsibility (CSR)increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic andextrinsic CSR attribution [J]. Business Ethics a European Review,2015, 24(2):111–124. 被引量:1
  • 4Barone M J, Norman A T, Miyazaki A D. Consumer response toretailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better- [J].Journal of Retailing, 2007, 83(4): 437–445. 被引量:1
  • 5Lyon T P, Montgomery A W. Tweetjacked: The impact of socialmedia on corporate greenwash [J]. Journal of business ethics,2013, 118(4): 747-757. 被引量:1
  • 6Chang K, Kim I, Li Y. The heterogeneous impact of corporatesocial responsibility activities that target different stakeholders[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, 125(2): 211-234. 被引量:1
  • 7Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 8Mitchell R K, Agle B R, Wood D J. Toward a theory ofstakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle ofwho and what really counts [J]. Academy of ManagementReview, 1997, 22(4): 853-886. 被引量:1
  • 9Thijssens T, Bollen L, Hassink H. Secondary stakeholderinfluence on CSR disclosure: an application of stakeholdersalience theory [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 26(3):1-19. 被引量:1
  • 10Clarkson M E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing andevaluating corporate social performance [J]. Academy ofmanagement review, 1995, 20(1): 92-117. 被引量:1

二级参考文献116

  • 1陈向明.社会科学中的定性研究方法[J].中国社会科学,1996(6):93-102. 被引量:243
  • 2辜明安.法治视角的社会信用之构建刍议[J].河北法学,2006,24(4):33-38. 被引量:10
  • 3Marlowe L., 1975, Social Psychology, Holbrook Press Inc. 被引量:1
  • 4中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC).《第21次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》,2008年7月24日,光明网. 被引量:1
  • 5Aaker, Jennifer L., 1997, "Dimensions of Brand Personality", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), pp. 347-356. 被引量:1
  • 6Aupperle, Kenneth, Archie Carroll and John D. Hatfield, 1985, "An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability", Academy of Management Journal, 28 (2), pp. 446-63. 被引量:1
  • 7Becker-Olsena, Karen L., B. Andrew Cudmoreb and Ronald Paul Hill, 2006, "The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior", Journal of Business Research, 59, pp. 46-53. 被引量:1
  • 8Berens, Guido, Cees B.M. van Riel and Gerrit H. van Bruggen, 2005, “Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance”, Journal of Marketing, 69 (July), pp. 35-18. 被引量:1
  • 9Biehal, Gabriel J. and Daniel A. Sheinin, 2007, UThe Influence of Corporate Messages on the Product Portfolio", Journal of Marketing, 71 (April), pp.12-25. 被引量:1
  • 10Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin, 1997, “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses”, Journal of Marketing, 61 (January), pp. 68-84. 被引量:1

共引文献205

同被引文献29

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部