摘要
在农村土地所有权、承包权和经营权"三权分置"改革中,对于土地承包权的性质有"成员权说"和"物权说"之争。原因在于,前者之所指为土地承包权Ⅰ——集体成员承包土地的资格;后者所指为土地承包权Ⅱ,即从土地承包经营权中分离出土地经营权后的权利状态。"三权分置"下的土地承包权,既非土地承包权Ⅰ,亦非土地承包权Ⅱ,而是权利人行使土地承包经营权、在其上设立一种"权利用益物权"——土地经营权的结果。作为土地的收益权,它类似于德国法上的"土地负担"。与土地承包经营权相比,它在权能、对权利人的生存保障方式与社会意蕴上具有独特性。它的转让须符合限制条件。它的存续、消灭取决于土地承包权Ⅰ。它与土地经营权的利益协调直接关系到"三权分置"改革的效果,需审慎处理。
In the separation reform of the three types of rights within the ownership of farmland,the contract right and the management right, there is a dispute that the nature of land contract right is ＂ member right＂ or ＂ real right＂. The reason is which the former refers to the land contract right I , that is, the qualification for collective members contracting the farmland; the latter refers to the land contract right Ⅱ , that is, the rights after separating the management right from the land contract-management right. The land contract right under ＂the separation of the three types of rights＂ is neither the land contract right I , nor the land contract rightⅡ , but the result for the right person to set up the land management rights on the land contract-management right. As an income right of land, it is similar to ＂the land burden＂ in German law. Compared with the land contract-management right, it has the unique characteristics in the power, the way to protect the right persons and social implications. Its transfer shall be in accordance with the limiting conditions. Its existence and elimination depend on the land contract right I . The coordination of interests between it and the
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期37-47,共11页
Hebei Law Science
基金
广西哲学社会科学规划课题<农村土地"三权分置"改革研究>(150FX002)
广西高校"党的十八届三中全会精神研究"专项课题<广西农村土地产权制度创新研究>(DSBD14YB05)
关键词
三权分置
土地所有权
土地承包权
土地经营权
土地承包经营权
the separation ofmanagement right
the threethe landtypes of rights
the land contract right
the landcontract-managementright
