期刊文献+

基于计划行为理论的竞争驾驶行为建模 被引量:15

Modeling of Competitive Driving Behavior Based on Theory of Planned Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为获取竞争驾驶行为的潜变量因子,分析驾驶员竞争驾驶行为的产生动机.对225名驾驶员进行了网上问卷调查,通过主成分分析和验证性因子分析提取竞争驾驶行为的4个潜变量因子:速度领先、空间占用、路权争夺和空间领先争夺.基于计划行为理论,构建了竞争驾驶意图与行为关系结构方程模型.研究表明,驾驶员的竞争驾驶态度、主观标准、知觉行为控制等心理因素和社会环境外界因素,通过行为意向能够很好地对竞争驾驶行为进行预测.社会环境因素对竞争驾驶意图有显著影响,为驾驶员竞争驾驶行为的矫正提供了有效途径. This paper aims to investigate the dimensionality of drivers' behaviors and analyze the motives of competitive driving behavior. Data are collected from a self-reported questionnaire completed by 225 drivers on the internet. Principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are used to analyze the underlying factor structure. Four latent factors are derived, including speed advantage, space occupation, contention over the right-of-way, and space advantage. Structural equation modeling is established to explain the correlation between drivers' attitude and driving behavior based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Results indicate that competitive driving behavior could be predicted by the combination of attitudes, subjective norm, control of perceived behavior, and social environment through the medium of behavior intention. A high correlation between the dimensions of social environment and intention is observed. This is an effective way to rectify the competitive driving behavior.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期92-98,共7页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 北京市教育委员会重点项目(KZ20151005007)~~
关键词 城市交通 计划行为理论 结构方程模型 竞争驾驶行为 社会环境 urban traffic theory of planned behavior structural equation modeling competitive driving behavior social environment
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Neuman T R, Pfefer R, Slack K L, et al. Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO strategic highway safety plan[R]. Volume 1: A Guide for Addressing Aggressive- Driving Collisions. NCHRP Report 500. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 2Reason J, Manstead A, Straling S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction?[J].Ergonomics, 1990, 33(10-11): 1315-1332. 被引量:1
  • 3Lawton R, Parker D, Stradling S, et al. Predicting road traffic accidents: The role of social deviance and violations[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1997,88(2):249-262. 被引量:1
  • 4Mesken J, Lajunen T, Summala H. Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation toaccident involvement in Finland[J]. Ergonomics, 2002,45(7): 469-483. 被引量:1
  • 5Blockey L, Hartley L. Aberrant driving behavior: errors and violations[J]. Ergonomics, 1995, 39(9): 1759-1771. 被引量:1
  • 6骆勇..道路交通中攻击性驾驶行为分析与研究[D].西南交通大学,2009:
  • 7Ajzen I. Theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2):179-211. 被引量:1
  • 8Parker D, Manstead A S R, Stradling S G, et al.Determinants of intentions to commit driving violations[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1992,24(2): 117-131. 被引量:1
  • 9Ulleberg P, Rundmo T. Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers[J]. Safety Science, 2003, 41(5):427-443. 被引量:1
  • 10Iversen H, Rundmo T. Attitudes towards traffic safety,driving behavior and accident involvement among the Norwegian public[J]. Ergonomics, 2004, 47(5): 555-572. 被引量:1

二级参考文献31

共引文献67

同被引文献101

引证文献15

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部