摘要
【目的】了解审稿人对于其所评审稿件的他审和终审意见的反馈需求情况及其意义。【方法】2015年6月,以EMAIL的形式向《中华围产医学杂志》全体审稿人发放关于"审稿人评审意见互相反馈需求"的调查问卷。调查问卷中提到的需要反馈的评审意见包括另外一位审稿人的意见(他审意见)和编委会(或主编)的终审意见。【结果】共回收有效调查问卷54份,有50位(93%)审稿人明确表示希望获得评审意见反馈,其中37位审稿人认为我刊非常有必要进行评审意见反馈,32位审稿人希望在稿件远程管理系统中自动显示。45位审稿人(83%,45/54)认为希望获得评审意见反馈的原因是有助于提高自己的审稿水平。【结论】绝大多数审稿人希望获得评审意见反馈。向审稿人反馈评审意见,有助于加强编辑部与审稿人的沟通,进而提高审稿人的主人翁意识和责任感,使之形成内在动力,最终提高审稿质量和积极性。
[Purposes] This paper aims to investigate the needs and significance of the feedback to reviewer from other reviewers＇ opinion and the final judgments of the articles he reviewed. [Methods]The＂Feedback demand of reviewers on comments from each other＂questionnaire was sent to all reviewers of Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine by emails in June 2015. The feedback of comments mentioned in the questionnaire included other reviewers＇ comments and the final judgment of the editorial board（ or the chief editor）. [Findings] Fifty four valid questionnaires were collected. Fifty（ 93%） reviewers made it clear that they would like to receive feedbacks from other reviewers,among which,37 reviewers thought it was necessary to feedback on other reviewers＇ comments and 32 reviewers wanted feedbacks automatically by the remote manuscript peer reviewsystem of the journal. Forty-five reviewers（ 83%,45 /54） believed that the feedback could be helpful to improve their reviewing level. [Conclusions] The vast majority of reviewers would like to receive feedback on the review,which might help to strengthen the communication between the editorial department and reviewers,and enhance the feeling of ownership and responsibility of the reviewers to establish their intrinsic motivations,and ultimately improve the quality and enthusiasm of peer review.
出处
《中国科技期刊研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期148-151,共4页
Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
