期刊文献+

审查逮捕引导侦查质量评估报告——以《刑事诉讼法》修订后为视角

Assessment report of guiding investigation quality by review of arrest——perspective from revised Criminal Proceeding Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人类对于事物的认识总是具有局限性,检察机关在审查逮捕时不仅需要通过证据审查来排除合理怀疑,还需要综合运用法律手段引导侦查取证,从而不断完善证据体系,保证诉讼顺利。依靠捕前介入侦查、不捕后的补充侦查与逮捕后的深入取证这三种方式,能够为案件事实的最终认定提供帮助。 For limitations of human's understanding of things, when review the arrest, procuratorial organs not only need the review of evidence to exclude reasonable doubt, but also need to use legal means to guide the investigation and evidence collection, so as to continuously improve the system to ensure smooth proceedings. Three methods of involving in the investigation before arrest,supplementary investigation after arrest and further evidence collection after arrest can provide help for the determination of the facts of the case.
出处 《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》 2016年第1期44-46,共3页 Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词 审查逮捕 引导侦查 证据 监督 review of arrest guiding investigation evidence supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1天津市北辰区人民检察院课题组,张铁英.检察机关“提前介入”问题研究[J].河北法学,2009,27(3):177-183. 被引量:18
  • 2陈亮..检察机关捕诉关系研究[D].华东政法大学,2011:
  • 3张少林著..审查逮捕证据审查与判断要点[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2011:586.

二级参考文献10

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部