期刊文献+

健康教育对妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后生活质量的影响 被引量:8

Effect of health education on quality of life in women after surgery for gynecologic malignant tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨健康教育对于妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后生活质量的影响。方法选择妇科恶性肿瘤患者160例随机均分为两组,分别为实施积极的健康教育护理干预(干预组)和妇科手术常规护理(对照组)。采用抑郁自评表(SDS)、焦虑自评表(SAS)和自拟的生活质量评定量表比较两组患者术后生活质量情况。结果干预组干预后的SDS和SAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组干预后反映生活质量的生理健康、心理健康和社会健康等指标评分均高于干预前(P<0.05);对照组干预前后无明显变化(P>0.05)。结论健康教育护理干预能明显缓解妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后抑郁和焦虑症状,改善生活质量。 Objective To study the effect of health education on the quality of life(QL) in women after surgery for gynecologic malignant tumors. Methods A total of 160 patients with gynecologic malignant tumors undergoing surgery was equally assigned into two groups of A(treated with health education) and B(treated with conventional nursing alone). The depression and anxiety status and the QL were evaluated using self-rating depression scale(SDS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and a self-designed scale for assessing the QL. Results The scores of SDS and SAS after surgery were significantly less in group A than those in group B (P〈0. 05). The scores of QL including physical health, mental health and social health were more after surgery than those before in group A(P〈0. 05) ,which were not significantly changed in group B(P〉0. 05). Conclusion Health education can effectively attenuate the symptoms of depression and anxiety and improve the QL after surgery in the women with gynecologic malignant tumors.
作者 黄勇
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2016年第3期308-309,共2页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 妇科恶性肿瘤 生活质量 健康教育 Gynecologic malignant tumors Quality of life Health education
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献46

  • 1苏小茵,蔡月英.认知行为治疗用于妇科癌症化疗期病人的尝试[J].实用护理杂志,1996,12(11):517-518. 被引量:4
  • 2周金黄.神经免疫调节研究的新进展[J].生理科学进展,1987,18(3):199-202. 被引量:3
  • 3Back KW.社会心理学[M].南京:南开大学出版社,1996.. 被引量:1
  • 4沈渔邨,中华医学杂志,1999年,79卷,2期,155页 被引量:1
  • 5Back K W,社会心理学,1996年 被引量:1
  • 6周金黄,生理科学进展,1987年,18卷,3期,199页 被引量:1
  • 7Sigurdardottir V, Bolund C, et al. The impact of generalized malignant melanoma on quality of life evaluated by the EORTC questionnaire technique[J]. Quality Of Life Research, 1993,2:193-207. 被引量:1
  • 8Olschewski M, Schulgen G, Schnmacher M, et al. Quality of life assessment in clinical cancer research[J]. British Journal of Cancer, 1994,70:1-5. 被引量:1
  • 9Andersen MR,Peacock S,Nelson J,et al.Worry about ovarian cancer risk and use of ovarian cancer screening by women at risk for ovarian cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2002,85:3-8. 被引量:1
  • 10Hensley ML,Robson ME,Kauff ND,et al.Pre-and postmenopausal high-risk women undergoing screening for ovarian cancer:anxiety,risk perceptions,and quality of life[J].Gynecol Oncol,2003,89:440-446. 被引量:1

共引文献92

同被引文献46

引证文献8

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部