期刊文献+

我国制造业上市公司会计舞弊现状及特点分析——基于2006-2015年证监会处罚公告 被引量:11

Analysis on Accounting Fraud of Chinese Manufacturing Listed Companies: Status Quo and Characteristics——Based on the Punishment Notice of China Securities Regulatory Commission from Year 2006 to 2015
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2006年至2015年因会计舞弊受到中国证监会行政处罚的50家制造业上市公司为研究样本,运用统计描述与数量分析的方法,对现阶段我国制造业上市公司会计舞弊样本的行业分布、舞弊方式手段和涉案人员进行了统计分析。最后结合我国国情,从宏微观方面提出反舞弊对策,以利于我国关于会计舞弊有效治理措施的制定与实施。 With the 50 manufacturing listed companies punished by China Securities Regulatory Commission because of accounting fraud from year 2006 to 2015 as samples, and using statistics description and quantitative analysis methods, this paper statistically analyses the industry attribution, fraud means and methods, and the involved personnel of fraud samples nowadays. At last, combined with Chinese national conditions, this paper puts forward anti -fraud measures from mac- roscopic and microcosmic aspects, in favor of the formulation and implementation of effective accounting fraud govern-
作者 梅丹
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《湖南财政经济学院学报》 2016年第1期48-55,共8页 Journal of Hunan University of Finance and Economics
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"内部控制缺陷披露 资本成本与投资者行为"(项目编号:14YJC630098) 天津市2012年度哲学社会科学规划课题"内部控制缺陷披露的经济后果研究"(项目编号:TJGL 12-004)
关键词 会计舞弊 制造业上市公司 统计分析 accounting fraud manufacturing listed companies statistical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Persons O. Using Financial Statement Data to Identify Factors As- sociated with Fraudulent Financing Reporting [ J] . Journal of Applied Business Research, 1995, (11) : 38 -46. 被引量:1
  • 2韩文明.中国上市公司会计造假行为的统计特征分析[J].审计与经济研究,2005,20(5):56-60. 被引量:11
  • 3Albecht W. S, Wernz G. W & W illiams T. L. Fraud : Bring the Light to the Dark Side of Business [ M ] . NewYork Irwin Inc, NewYork, 1995, 15-52. 被引量:1
  • 4Bologua G. J. , Lindquist, R. J. & Wells J. T. The Accountant' s Handlxmk of Fraud and Commercial Crime [ M ] . John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, 1993.20- 31. 被引量:1
  • 5Dechow P. , Sloan R. and Sweeney A. Cases and Consequences of Earnings Manipulations: An Analysis of Finns Subject to En- foreement Actions by the SEC [J] . The Accounting Review, 1996, (4) : 441 -454. 被引量:1
  • 6Beasley M. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud [J].The Accounting Review, 1996, (10) : 443 -465. 被引量:1
  • 7Uzun H. , Szewczyk S. H. and Varma R. Board Composition and Corporate Fraud [J] . Financial Analysts Journal, 2004, (3) : 33 -43. 被引量:1
  • 8Bessley M. S. , Carcello L V and Hermanson D. IL Fraudulent Fi- nancial Reporting: 1987 - 1997--An Analysis of U. S. Public Companies [ C ] . A monograph Published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ( COSO ) [ R] . NewYork. 1999. 1 -30. 被引量:1
  • 9Johnson S. A., Ryan H. E. and Tian Y. S. Managerial Incen- tives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives Matter [J] . Review of Finance, 2009, (1) : 115 -145. 被引量:1
  • 10CoRrell D. M, Albrecht W. S. Recognizing the Symptoms of Employee Fraud [ J ] . Health Care Financial Management, 1994, (5): 19-25. 被引量:1

二级参考文献50

共引文献53

同被引文献65

引证文献11

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部