期刊文献+

财务报表舞弊、监管处罚倾向与审计师责任——基于中国证监会处罚公告的分析 被引量:10

Financial Statement Frauds,the Tendency of Regulatory Sanctions and Auditor Decision:An Analysis of Enforcement Action in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以受到证监会处罚的上市公司为样本,按其违规形式分为有报表舞弊行为的公司和有会计信息违规披露行为的公司两种,并进一步把报表舞弊细分为与收入相关的舞弊和与资产相关的舞弊,通过设置Logistic模型验证了上市公司财务报表舞弊与其审计师受处罚之间的相关规律,即当审计师不能识别并公正地报告被审计单位财务报表舞弊,特别是与收入有关的报表舞弊时受处罚可能性就很大。进而明确审计师的责任并对审计准则的修订提出了相应建议。 Based on the enforcement actions issued by China Securities Regulatory Commission against listed companies, this article divides frauds into two categories : financial statement frauds and inadequate disclosure. It further divides the finan- cial statement frauds into the revenue-related misstatement and asset-related misstatement. The article tests the relevant laws between the financial statement frauds of listed companies and auditor sanctions by logistic model . We find that auditors are more likely to be sanctioned if they fail to detect and report material misstatement frauds, especially the revenue -related frauds, rather than detect and report inadequate disclosure. At the end ,this article gives some suggestions to the decision of the auditor and the auditing standards.
作者 余海宗 袁洋
机构地区 西南财经大学
出处 《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第5期99-108,共10页 China Economic Studies
关键词 报表舞弊 审计失败 审计师 受罚 financial statement frauds audit failures auditor sanction
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Bonner S E, Palmrose Z, Young S M, et al. 1998. Fraud Type and Auditor Litigation : An Analysis of SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases [ J ]. The Accounting Review,73 (4) : 503-532. 被引量:1
  • 2Carcello J V, Palmrose Z V. 1994. Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research ,32 (Supplement) : 1-30. 被引量:1
  • 3DeFond M L,Wong T J,Li S,et al. 2000. The Impact of Improved Auditor Independence on Audit Market Concentration in China[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,28(3) :269-305. 被引量:1
  • 4Beloitte. 2007. Ten things about financial statement fraud: a review of SEC enforcement releases 2000--2006[ M]. Deloitte Forensic Center. 被引量:1
  • 5Firth M, Mo P L L, Wong R M K, et al. 2005. Financial Statement Frauds and Auditor Sanctions : An Analysis of Enforcement Actions in China [ J ]. Journal of Business Ethics, 62 ( 4 ) : 367-381. 被引量:1
  • 6Feroz E H, Park K, Pastena V S, et al. 1991. The Financial and Market Effects of the SEC's Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases [ J ]. Journal of Accounting Research,29 (Supplement) : 107-142. 被引量:1
  • 7Loebbecke J K, Eining M M ,Willingham J J ,et al. 1989. 'Auditors' experience with Material Irregularities: Frequency, Nature, and Detectability [ J ]. Auditing :A Journal of Practice & Theory ,9 ( 1 ) : 1-28. 被引量:1
  • 8Palmrose Z, Scholz S. 2004. The Circumstances and Legal Consequences of Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from Re- statements [ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Research. 21 ( 1 ) : 139-180. 被引量:1
  • 9Palmrose Z V. 1987. Litigation and independent auditors:The role of business failures and management fraud Auditing [ J ]. A Journal of Practice & Theory. 6 (spring) :90-103. 被引量:1
  • 10Rezaee ,2002. Financial Statement Fraud-Prevention and Detection [ M ]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 被引量:1

二级参考文献45

共引文献704

同被引文献118

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部