摘要
目的 比较医用碳粉湿巾和磺胺嘧啶银治疗烧伤患者烧伤创面的临床效果.方法 收集2012年3月至2015年3月间我院接诊的烧伤患者80例进行临床研究,通过随机数字列表法将所有患者随机分成对照组（40例）和研究组（40例）.对照组患者给予磺胺嘧啶银外用药剂治疗,研究组患者给予医用碳粉湿巾治疗.观察两组患者的临床治疗效果,并进行对比分析.结果 研究组患者经治疗后的创面愈合时间为（13.27±1.97）d,感染发生率为7.5％,瘢痕发生率为10.0％,明显低于对照组的（21.35±3.82）d、37.5％、27.5％,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 与磺胺嘧啶银相比,医用碳粉湿巾在烧伤患者创面的治疗中明显更具优势,值得推广应用.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of medical powdered carbon textile versus silvadene in the treatment of burn wounds in burn patients.Methods Eighty burn patients treated at our hospital from March, 2012 to March, 2015 were taken as clinical research objects and were randomly divided into a control group（40 cases） and an observation group（40 cases） by the random number list method.The control group were treated with silvadene and the observation group with medical powdered carbon textile.The clinical effects of these two groups were compared and observed.Results After the treatment, the wound healing time [（13.27±1.97） d vs.（21.35±3.82） d] was significantly shorter and the infection rate（7.5% vs.37.5%） and the incidence of scar formation （10.0% vs.27.5%） were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group, with statistical difference （P〈0.05）.Conclusions Medical powdered carbon textile in the treatment of burn wounds has an obvious advantage over silvadene and worth being generalized.
出处
《国际医药卫生导报》
2016年第2期216-218,共3页
International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词
医用碳粉湿巾
磺胺嘧啶银
烧伤
创面
临床疗效
Medical powdered carbon textile
Silvadene
Burn
Wound
Clinical effect
