摘要
在西方哲学的发展历程中,回归希腊源头、追求同一性的思维是大部分哲学家的意图,列维纳斯另辟蹊径,反对一切都在"存在论"的范畴内讨论问题,提出要逃避存在,异于存在,走向"他者"。"他者"在他那里是先于存在,在存在之外的,是责任的源头,有了"他者",才有自我和世界。德里达一方面反对这种伦理形而上学的思维,认为其虽然拓宽了哲学思考的方向,却仍未能摆脱"存在论"的范畴;另一方面,在他晚年时期又不自觉地受了列维纳斯和"他者伦理学"的影响,发展了自己的政治哲学思想。
In the course of development of Western philosophy, to return to the Greek source and seek the identity is the intent of most philosophers, however, Levinas put forward otherwise than ＂being＂ and toward ＂other＂ to object ＂ontology＂. In Levinas, ＂other＂ is prior to ＂being＂, beyond ＂being＂ and the source of the responsibility. The self and world would not be if there is no ＂other＂. Derrida opposed ethics metaphysic theories, which was considered as widening the philosophy thinking direction, but still failed to get rid of the ＂ontology＂ category; On the other hand, in his late years, he was immersed unconsciously into levinas and ＂other ethics＂, and developed his political philosophy.
出处
《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第6期1166-1170,共5页
Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
