期刊文献+

关于中文学术期刊开放获取的再思考 被引量:14

Thoughts on open access of Chinese academic journals
原文传递
导出
摘要 S计划的提出将开放获取(Open Access,OA)提升到一个新的高度,对于中文学术期刊的OA必须深入思考。在OA2020的推进过程中,学术出版不同环节经历着长期的博弈和努力,而绝大多数中文学术期刊由于存在着主观和客观上的障碍,只在自建网站上实施了OA。为了推进高质量中文学术期刊金色OA并达到知识普惠社会发展的要求,笔者认为应该允许相关期刊收取合理的文章处理费,充分利用现有的OA平台,并探索在期刊集成平台上的OA。 As the proposal of S plan will push the open access(OA)to a new height,the OA of Chinese academic journal must be considered in deeply.In the process of promoting OA2020,different strategies of the academic publishing have experienced long-term games and efforts,the divergence of open access is focused on the international publishers.Due to the subjective and objective obstacles to OA,most Chinese academic journals only implement open access on their self-established websites.In order to promote high-quality Chinese academic journals become golden OA and to meet the requirements of scientific knowledge,we think it is necessary to allow charging Article Processing Charge(APC)of the relevant journals,make full use of the existing open access platforms,and explore open access on the major Chinese integrated journal platforms.
作者 徐文娟 XU Wenjuan(Editorial Board of Journal of Inorganic Materials,200050,Shanghai,China)
出处 《编辑学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期523-526,530,共5页 Acta Editologica
关键词 开放获取 OA2020 中文学术期刊 开放获取障碍 金色OA open access OA2020 Chinese academic journals obstacles to OA golden OA
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献114

共引文献165

同被引文献159

引证文献14

二级引证文献86

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部