摘要
在老子和卢梭看来,人类所谓的文明之路,实则一条自我奴役之路。老子认为,文明虽是社会发展的产物,却与道的本性相悖,理想的人类社会应该是自然无为的。对此,老子提出了"小国寡民"的主张。卢梭亦将人类不平等的起源归结于由文明而来的私有制,进而认为不平等导致了社会纷争与道德的沦丧。对此,卢梭认为,基于一种社会契约的人民民主共和国,才是最有利于人自身的国家。
In Lao tzu and Rousseau＇ s opinion, the road of human civilization in fact is a path of selfslavery.Lao tzu considers that civilization is the product of social development,but it is contrary to the nature of Tao,beeause the ideal human society should be the result of natural inaction.In this regard Lao tzu puts forward the ＂a small country with a small population＂.Rousseau also think that the origin of human inequality due to the private ownership by civilization, and that inequality has led to social strife and morality.In this regard,Rousseau believes that the People＇s Republic of China based on a social contract is the most beneficial to their own country.
出处
《长江大学学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第12期73-75,共3页
Journal of Yangtze University（Social Sciences Edition）
关键词
老子
卢梭
文明
批判
Lao tzu
Rousseau
civilization
criticism
