摘要
目的:验证家庭环境量表中文版在问题青少年群体的信度和效度。方法:902名12-25岁青少年接受家庭环境量表中文版调查,其中心理障碍222例、违法者290例、正常者390人,用信度分析、因素分析和组间比较验证量表的信度和效度。结果:除情感表达、独立性和宗教观外,其它分量表在三个样本中的信度都在0.5以上,除独立性和控制性外,其它分量表得分组间差异具有显著性(P<0.05);正常青少年样本探索性因素分析获得三因子:关系(亲密度、情感表达、矛盾性、组织性)、个人成长(娱乐性、知识性)、稳定性(成功性、组织性、控制性),累计解释总方差的64.70%,验证性因素分析显示三因素交叉模型的拟合度优于Moos三因素模型和刘丹三因素模型。结论:独立性和宗教观信度很差,娱乐性、成功性和情感表达信度较差,其它分量表的信度符合心理测量学要求,家庭环境量表中文版8个分量表符合三因素交叉模型,对不同人群具有鉴别效度。
Objective： To examine the reliability and validity of the Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version（FESCV）. Methods： The FES-CV was administered to 390 normal adolescents, 290 juvenile delinquents and 222 patients with mental disorder. Results： Except for expressiveness, independence and moral-religious emphasis, the reliabilities of other subscales were above 0.5 in all three samples; except for independence and control, there were significant group differences on other subscales（P〈0.05）; Exploratory factor analysis of normal adolescent sample obtained three factor： relationship（cohesion, expressiveness, conflict, and organization）, personal growth（intellectual-cultural orientation and active-recreational orientation）, and system maintenance（achievement orientation, organization, and control）, which explained total variance of64.7%. Fit index and incremental index in confirmatory factor analysis supported that the three-factor interaction model was better than the Moos or Liu Dan three-factor model. Conclusion： The reliabilities of the independence and moral-religious orientation are very poor, active-recreational orientation, achievement orientation, and expressiveness are poor, and other subscales meet with psychometric requirements; The findings in this study support a three-factors interaction model for FES-CV.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第6期1024-1027,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家社会科学基金(13BSH062)资助
关键词
青少年
家庭环境量表
信度
效度
Adolescent
Family environment scale
Reliability
Validity
