期刊文献+

18 F-FDG PET/CT显像在小细胞肺癌预后评估中的价值 被引量:13

Value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for prognosis evaluation in patients with small cell lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析18 F-FDG PET/CT显像在初诊小细胞肺癌( SCLC)预后评估中的价值。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年12月按常规方法行18 F-FDG PET/CT检查并经病理证实的初诊SCLC患者49例(男35例,女14例;中位年龄61岁),根据检查时临床资料进行功能状态( PS)评分,根据检查结果分期并随访(≥6个月)生存期。统计学分析采用两独立样本t检验、Kaplan-Meier生存分析、log-rank非参数检验及Cox回归生存分析。结果(1)49例患者随访过程中死亡20例,失访1例,45例患者(91.84%)存在转移。根据18F-FDG PET/CT图像进行分期,疾病局限(LD)期患者27例,疾病扩展(ED)期患者22例。(2)中位OS为23.68个月,PFS为19.93个月。 LD期患者的中位OS (35.30个月)及PFS(28.87个月)均明显长于ED期患者的中位OS(12.57个月)及PFS(11.30个月)(χ2=18.810和13.647,均P<0.05)。(3)49例患者原发灶SUVmax为1.97~21.50。 LD期患者原发灶SUVmax (8.27±3.14)与ED期患者原发灶SUVmax(9.68±5.36)间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 SUVmax与患者的OS及PFS无相关性(均P>0.05),且在LD和ED期患者中,高、低SUVmax亚组的中位OS与PFS间差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=0.001~0.565,均P>0.05)。(4)根据18F-FDG PET/CT得到的分期结果与PS评分为SCLC的独立预后因素(风险比分别为3.93和5.00,均P<0.05),原发灶SUVmax与预后并无显著相关性。结论18 F-FDG PET/CT 显像时,患者的 PS 评分以及根据显像结果进行的分期为SCLC患者独立预后因素,而原发灶SUVmax与预后的关系有待进一步研究。 Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in untreated small cell lung cancer ( SCLC) . Methods A total of 49 SCLC patients( 35 males, 14 females, median age 61 years) with pathologically confirmed SCLC had underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan before treatment from January 2008 to December 2013 and were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Clinical staging were mainly deter-mined by 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan. Performance status ( PS) was acquired according to the clinical symptoms before PET examination. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months and the survival interval was recor-ded. Two-sample t test, Kaplan-Merier, log-rank and Cox regression analysis were used for statistical analy-sis. Results (1)Among 49 patients, 20 died during the follow-up, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 45 patients(91.84%) had metastasis. Patients with limited disease (LD) and extensive disease (ED) were 27 and 22 respectively according to 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. (2)The median OS was 23.68 months and me-dian PFS was 19.93 months. LD patients had significantly longer OS and PFS than ED patients (35.30 months vs 12.57 months, 28.87 months vs 11.30 months;χ2=18.810, 13.647, both P〈0.05). (3)SUVmax of primary tumor ranged from 1.97 to 21.50. The SUVmax of primary foci had no difference between LD(8.27± 3.14) and ED(9.68±5.36)patients(P〉0.05). SUVmax of primary tumor showed no significant correlation with OS and PFS (both P〉0.05).There were no significant differences in OS and PFS between low SUVmax group and high SUVmax group in both LD and ED patients (χ2=0.001-0.565, all P〉0.05). (4) Staging based on 18 F-FDG PET/CT results and PS score were independent prognostic factors ( hazard ratios:3.93, 5-00, both P〈0.05) , while SUVmax showed no significant prognostic value. Conclusions PS score before PET scan and imaging staging based on 18 F-FDG PET/CT results are independent prognostic factors. The predictive value of primary
出处 《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第6期442-445,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
关键词 小细胞 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 体层摄影术 X线计算机 脱氧葡萄糖 Carcinoma,small cell Lung Tomography,emission-computed Tomography,X-ray computed Deoxyglucose
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90. 被引量:1
  • 2Cerfolio Pal, Bryant AS, Ohja B, et al. The maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of a non-small cell lung cancer predict stage, recurrence, and survival [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 130(1) : 151-159. 被引量:1
  • 3Ambrosini V, Nicolini S, Caroli P, et al. PET/CT imaging in dif- ferent types of lung cancer: an overview [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(5) : 988-1001. 被引量:1
  • 4Kalemkerian GP, Gadgeel SM. Modem staging of small cell lung cancer[J]. J Natl Compr Cane Netw, 2013, 11(1) : 99-104. 被引量:1
  • 5Yip D, Harper PG. Predictive and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: current status[J]. Lung Cancer, 2000, 28( 3): 173- 185. 被引量:1
  • 6Simon GR, Wagner H, American College of Chest Physicians. Small cell lung cancer[J]. Chest, 2003, 123 (1 Suppl) : 259S- 271S. 被引量:1
  • 7Sculier JP, Chansky K, Crowley JJ, et al. The impact of additional prognostic factors on survival and their relationship with the ana-tomical extent of disease expressed by the 6th Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors and the proposals for the 7th E-dition[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2008, 3(5) : 457-466. 被引量:1
  • 8Brueckl WM, Herbst L, Lechler A, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC)-analysis from routine clinical practice [ J ]. Anticancer Res, 2006, 26 ( 6C ) : 4825-4832. 被引量:1
  • 9Borst GR, Belderbos JS, Boellaard R, et al. Standardised FDG up- take: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2005, 41(11): 1533-1541. 被引量:1
  • 10Li M, Sun Y, Liu Y, et al. Relationship between primary lesion FDG uptake and clinical stage at PET-CT for non-small cell lung cancer patients : An observation [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2010, 68 (3) : 394-397. 被引量:1

同被引文献62

引证文献13

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部