摘要
目的分析VSD治疗骨科创伤及感染创面的临床疗效。方法选择2013年4月~2014年4月的骨科创伤及感染创面的100例患者作为研究对象,随机分配为对照组和观察组,各50例,所有的患者进行常规的清创手术,对照组采用常规一般治疗方法,根据患者的创面情况进行相应的措施治疗,观察组采用VSD治疗,做好抗感染工作,进行相关的专业处理。最后,对两组的疗效进行分析总结。结果分别对两组患者进行常规情况了解后,对两组患者采取不同的治疗方法,观察组患者的平均住院时间为（15.7±4.6）天明显少于对照组患者的平均住院时间（25.4±5.1）天,两组数据显著差异,具有统计学意义,P〈0.05,并且分别对两组骨科创伤患者进行分组治疗后,两组患者的临床症状均有所好转,但是观察组患者的临床症状改善情况明显优于对照组患者,两组数据差异显著,具有统计学意义,P〈0.05,并且观察组的总有效率96.0%明显高于对照组的总有效率80.0%,两组数据差异显著,具有统计学意义,P〈0.05。结论综上所述,VSD治疗对于骨科创伤以及感染创面患者是一个很好的治疗方法,其治疗效果明显优于传统的换药以及引流方法,并且VSD治疗可以大大减轻患者换药时的痛苦,明显缩短创面愈合时间,减少住院时间,加快感染创面的愈合,值得临床推广。
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of VSD treatment in the Department of orthopedics trauma and wound infection. Methods 100 cases of Department of orthopedics trauma and wound infection in 2013 April- 2014 year in April in our hospital patients as the research object,randomly divided into control group and observation group,each of 50 cases,all patients underwent routine debridement operation,the control group with routine general treatment method,the corresponding treatment measures according to the wound patients,the observation group treated with VSD,do the work of anti infection treatment,the relevant professional. Finally,the curative effects of two groups were analyzed. Results Both the conventional understanding of two groups of patients,using different treatment methods of two groups of patients,average length of stay of the observation group of patients was（ 15. 7 ± 4. 6） days,the average hospitalization time was significantly less than the control group（ 25. 4 ± 5. 1） days, the data of the two groups were significant differences,with statistical significance,P〈0. 05 and,respectively,were divided into two groups of two groups of Department of orthopedics trauma patients,two groups of patients with clinical symptoms were improved,but the observation group of patients with clinical symptoms improved significantly better than the control group,the differences between the two groups of data significantly,with statistical significance,P〈0. 05,and the total efficiency of the observation group 96% was significantly higher than the efficiency of 80% the control group,the differences between the two groups of data significantly,with statistical significance,P〈0. 05. Conclusions In conclusion,VSD treatment for Department of orthopedics trauma and wound infection patients is a good treatment,the treatment effect is significantly better than the traditional dressing and drainage method,and VSD treatment can alleviate the patients dressing pain,shorten the wound healing time,reduce hospitaliz
出处
《航空航天医学杂志》
2015年第12期1482-1484,共3页
Journal of Aerospace medicine
关键词
VSD治疗
骨科创伤
感染创面
VSD treatment
Department of orthopedics trauma
wound infection
