摘要
文章以语言历史学派理论为基础,对比了汉文、古代突厥文、古藏文、和阗塞文历史记载,论述了不同语言文献对ik族属和来源的记述,认为ik不是ikil、Kiuk、t■ǐak、Kirkut,而是Km ik;在752年被回纥征服后,其部分迁至漠北、部分迁至焉耆、部分留居原地成为乃蛮的一部。
Applying the theories of the linguistic historic school, this paper comparing the documents in Chinese, Old Turkic, Old Tibet, Khotan Saka and discussing the records of the nationality and origin concerning the word Cik, held that Cik was not the same as the words of Cikil, Kiuk, tciak, or Kirkut that the word Kiam Cik. Part of Cik people had moved to the North of the Desert, part to Arkni, and the rest stayed to become part of Naiman in the Kam River after being conquered by the Uyghur in 752.
出处
《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第5期139-144,共6页
Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“与新疆有关的古代突厥-回鹘文文献整理研究”(10XTQ011)
自治区普通高校人文社科重点研究基地新疆民族文献研究中心课题“回鹘文史学价值研究”(XJEDU2011S04)
关键词
CIK
族属
迁徙
发展
Cik, Nationality, Movement, Evolution
