摘要
以德国为代表的均衡型城镇化与以日韩为代表的集聚型城镇化是两种典型的城镇化发展模式,两者的政策取向和实施路径存在显著差异。中国的新型城镇化战略欲扬二者之长而避二者之短,走出一条具有自身特色的城镇化新路。文章总结了德国城镇化发展的主要特点,剖析其均衡城镇化模式的特殊成因,探讨该模式对中国小城镇发展的主要启示。研究认为:德国均衡城镇化模式的形成,取决于它的历史渊源、法律约束、组织体制、经济基础及其一系列的体制机制创新;中国可以借鉴德国的经验但不可能完全照搬德国的模式;针对中国小城镇发展的现实困境,应重点实施"去等级化"和"去中心化"的两大制度改革。
The pattern of balanced urbanization represented by Germany and that of agglomerative urbanization represented by Japan and South Korea are two typical development models of urbanization, and their policy orientation and implementation path exists significant differences. The new urbanization strategy of China will raise both the advantages and avoid the disadvantages, blaze a new path of urbanization which has its own characteristics. This paper summarizes the main characteristics of the urbanization in Germany, analyzes its special causes of forming balanced urbanization model, and explores the German pattern to enlightenment for China＇s new urbanization. The research suggests that the formation of German balanced urbanization pattern depends on its historical origin, legal restraint, organization system, economic foundation and a series of system and mechanism innovation; China can draw lessons from Germany＇s experience but cannot copy the German model. For the realistic predicament of small town development in China, We should focus on the implementing the two institutional reforms,＇ i.e. ＂de-hierarchization＂ reform and ＂decentralization＂ reform.
出处
《经济地理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第11期54-60,70,共8页
Economic Geography
基金
上海市地质调查研究院资助项目(2015(D)-002(F)-03)
关键词
德国
均衡城镇化模式
成因
启示
中国
小城镇发展
体制瓶颈
Germany
balanced urbanization patterns
cause of formation
enlightenment
China
development of small towns
institutional bottlenecks
