期刊文献+

不同时间服用氯沙坦治疗原发性高血压病晨峰现象的疗效及安全性研究 被引量:14

Efficacy and Safety of Losartan at Different Time Points in the Treatment of Morning Blood Pressure Surge in Patients With Primary Hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同时间服用氯沙坦治疗原发性高血压病晨峰现象的疗效及安全性。方法选取2011年2月—2013年8月滨海康达医院收治的具有晨峰现象的轻中度原发性高血压病患者186例,采用随机数字表法分为3组,晨服组62例,每日8:00左右服用氯沙坦50 mg;晚服组64例,每日20:00左右服用氯沙坦50 mg;对照组60例,给予除血管紧张素受体阻断药(ARB)与血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂(ACEI)以外的降压药物治疗,比较3组患者治疗前后平均收缩压(MSBP)、平均舒张压(MDBP)、最高收缩压(MAXSBP)及最高舒张压(MAXDBP)的变化,晨峰现象缓解率及不良反应发生率。结果治疗前,3组患者MSBP、MDBP、MAXSBP、MAXDBP比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,3组患者MSBP、MAXSBP、MAXDBP比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);其中晨服组、晚服组患者MSBP低于对照组,晚服组患者MAXSBP和MAXDBP低于对照组,晚服组患者MSBP低于晨服组(P<0.05)。晨服组患者晨峰现象缓解率为32.3%(20/62),晚服组为76.6%(49/64),对照组为26.7%(16/60),3组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=37.839,P<0.001),其中晚服组患者晨峰现象缓解率高于晨服组和对照组(χ2=24.952、30.911,P<0.001)。晨服组患者不良反应发生率为53.2%(33/62),晚服组为53.1%(34/64),对照组为70.0%(42/60),3组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.743,P=0.093)。结论晚上服用氯沙坦更能有效地控制原发性高血压病晨峰现象,并不增加不良反应的发生,为更合理的治疗方案。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of losartan at different time points in the treatment of morning blood pressure surge( MBPS) in patients with primary hypertension. Methods We enrolled 186 patients with light and moderate primary hypertension and MBPS who were admitted into Binhaikangda Hospital from February 2011 to August2013. Using random number table method,we divided the patients into three groups. We assigned 62 patients into morning group in which 50 mg losartan was administrated at 8: 00, assigned 64 patients into evening group in which 50 mg losartan was administrated at 20: 00 and assigned 60 patients into control group in which hypotensive drugs apart from ARB and ACEI were administrated. Comparison was made among the three groups in the changes of MSBP,MDBP,MAXSBP and MAXDBP after treatment,the rate of MBPS alleviation and the incidence rate of adverse reaction. Results Before treatment,the three groups were not significantly different( P 〉0. 05) in MSBP,MDBP,MAXSBP and MAXDBP. After treatment,the three groups were significantly different( P〈 0. 05) in MSBP,MAXSBP and MAXDBP; morning group and evening group were lower( P 〈0. 05)than control group in MSBP,evening group was lower( P 〈0. 05) than control group in MAXSBP and MAXDBP,and evening group was lower( P〈 0. 05) than morning group in MSBP. The rates of MBPS alleviation of morning group,evening group and control group were 32. 3%( 20 /62),76. 6%( 49 /64) and 26. 7%( 16 /60) respectively, with no significant differences among the three groups( χ2= 37. 839,P 0. 001); the evening group was higher than morning group and control group in the rate of MBPS alleviation( χ2= 24. 952,30. 911,P〈 0. 001). The rates of adverse reaction of morning group,evening group and control group were 53. 2%( 33 /62),53. 1%( 34 /64) and 70. 0%( 42 /60) respectively,with no significant differences among the three groups( χ2= 4. 743,P = 0. 093). Conclusion The evening administration
作者 朱岫芳 康凯
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第32期3973-3976,共4页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 高血压 氯沙坦 治疗结果 药物毒性 Hypertension Losartan Treatment outcome Drug toxicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Head GA,Reid CM,Shiel LM,et al.Rate of morning increase in blood pressure is elevated in hypertensives[J].Am J Hypertens,2006,19(10):1010-1017. 被引量:1
  • 2Kario K.Morning surge in blood pressure and cardiovascular risk: evidence and perspectives[J].Hypertension,2010,56(5);765-773. 被引量:1
  • 3White WB.Impotance of aggressive blood pressure lowering when it may matter most[J].Am J Cardiol,2007,100(3A):10J-16. 被引量:1
  • 4Caliskan M,Caliskan Z,Gullu H,et al.Increased morning blood pressure surge and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patient with early stage hypertension[J].J Am Soc Hypertens,2014,8(9):652-659. 被引量:1
  • 5中国高血压防治指南修订委员会,刘力生,吴兆苏,等.中国高血压防治指南(2010年修订版)[R].2010. 被引量:1
  • 6Kaneda R,Kario K,Hoshide S,et al.Morning blood pressure hyper -reactivity is an independent predictor for hypertensive cardiac hyperthrophy in a community-dwelling population[J].Am J Hypertens,2005,18(12 Pt 1):1528-1533. 被引量:1
  • 7郑杨,赵巍.晨峰性高血压临床意义及治疗[J].中国实用内科杂志,2012,32(1):27-29. 被引量:18
  • 8鲁晓春.血压晨峰现象[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2013,15(8):895-896. 被引量:20
  • 9Kario K.Proposal of RAS-diuretic vs.RAS-calcium antagonist strategies in high-risk hypertension:insight from the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profile and central pressure[J].J Am Soc Hypertens,2010,4(5):215-218. 被引量:1
  • 10Xie JC,Yan H,Zhao YX,et ai.Prognostic value of morning blood pressure sui^e in clinical events:a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2015,24(2);362-369. 被引量:1

二级参考文献41

  • 1张维忠.血压变异和晨峰的概念及其临床意义[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):287-288. 被引量:300
  • 2黄锦荣,何茶叶,边长艳.高血压综合预防干预的效果:6年后果观察[J].中华高血压杂志,2007,15(1):22-25. 被引量:61
  • 3郑霞,王鑫,朱艳利,李文华,高海青.清晨高血压与靶器官损害的研究[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2007,45(8):801-803. 被引量:12
  • 4刘力生主编.中国高血压防治指南(2005年修订版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.20-30. 被引量:51
  • 5Kario K, Pickering TG, Umeda Y, et al. Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular dis- ease in elderly hypertensives: aprespective study[J].Circulation, 2003,107 ( 10): 1401-1406. 被引量:1
  • 6Kario K. Morning surge in blood pressure and cardiovascular risk: evidence and perspectives. Hypertension, 2010, 56:765 -773. 被引量:1
  • 7Hermida RC, Ayala DE,Mojon A,et al. Morning surge, dip ping, and sleep time blood pressure as prognostic markers of cardiovascular risk. Hypertension, 2013,61 : e3. 被引量:1
  • 8Palatinia P, Grassib G. The morning blood pressure surge: a dynamic and challenging concept. J Hypertension, 2011,29: 2316 -2319. 被引量:1
  • 9Li Y,Thijs L,Hansen TW,et al. International database on am bulatory blood pressure moniloring in relation to cardiovascular outcomes investigators: prognostic: value of the morning blood pressure surge in 5645 subjects from 8 populatinns. Hyperten sion,2010,55:1040 -1048. 被引量:1
  • 10Kario K. Is vascular morning blood pressure surge in the elder ly resistant to antihypertensives and more risky? Hyperten sion, 2012,60 : e1- 6. 被引量:1

共引文献103

同被引文献204

引证文献14

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部