期刊文献+

政治与社会基于对《论法的精神》的诠释 被引量:7

Politics and Society:An Interpretation of The Spirit of Laws
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以对孟德斯鸠思想的社会学诠释为出发点,重返《论法的精神》,借此澄清从现代政治科学到社会学的学科转换。一方面,孟德斯鸠借助对法的重新定义,将政治科学的视野拓宽到政府之下的社会,从而推动了从政治科学到社会学的过渡;另一方面,通过澄清政府的原则与民族的一般精神、风俗和礼仪的关系指出,在孟德斯鸠那里,政治并不是社会的一个子系统或附属领域,而是从政治视角出发来看的整个社会,甚至还超出了社会。借此,我们希望突破当前社会学重视社会,轻视政治的学科思维。 Starting with Comte and Durkheim's sociological reading of Montesquieu's The Spirit of Laws, this paper attempts to offer a reinterpretation of the work in order to clarify the transition from political science to sociology. This will help us to examine the basic issues and propositions of sociology. According to Montesquieu's critique, political scientists in the past saw society through the lens of natural law and social contract, excluding laws and customs as they were seen as either arbitrary outcomes of the will of legislator or practical actions by contingency, things of non-scientific nature. By redefining the concept of law, Montesquieu expanded the scope of political science from the study of human nature and political institutions to society as a whole, including climate, soil,the general spirit, mores, and manners of a nation, commerce, and religions as well. Thus, it promoted the transtion form political science to sociology. However, politics continued to be Montesquieu's primary interest. The principle of the governments, i.e. the passions of the citizens under particular governments, constitutes the political expression of the general spirit, the mores and the manners of the nations. In his view, it is the choice and action of a nation in political sphere that exercise definitive influence on other parts of a society. Legislation is the precise point that joins the principles of governments with the mores, manners, and general spirit of a nation, something that was overlooked in Comte and Durldleim's works. It is understood that for Montesquieu politics is not a subsystem of society, instead, it is a perspective through which a society can be examined as a whole, or a perspective that even transcends society itself. This brings us to question the current trend in sociology that places all its focus on society but neglects politics.
作者 陈涛
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期31-57,共27页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
基金 国家社科基金项目(15CSH004)的资助~~
关键词 政府的原则 风俗 立法者 社会 law, the principle of government, mores, legislator, society
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1阿隆,雷蒙.1992.雷蒙·阿隆回忆录[M].刘燕清,等,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店. 被引量:1
  • 2阿隆.社会学主要思潮[M].葛志强,胡秉诚,王沪宁,译.北京:华夏出版社,2000:66-20. 被引量:6
  • 3陈涛.2014.法则与任意-从社会契约论到实证主义社会学[G]//政治与法律评论(第四辑).北京:法律出版社. 被引量:1
  • 4陈涛.道德的起源与变迁——涂尔干宗教研究的意图[J].社会学研究,2015(3):69-95. 被引量:32
  • 5福柯.1997.什么是启蒙[J].李康,译.国外社会学(6). 被引量:1
  • 6海德格尔.2010.物的追问:康德关于先验原理的学说[M].赵卫国,译.上海译文出版社. 被引量:1
  • 7卢梭.2005.社会契约论[M].何兆武,译.北京:商务印书馆. 被引量:47
  • 8马基雅维利.2013.君主论·李维史论[M].潘汉典、薛军,译.长春:吉林出版集团. 被引量:1
  • 9盂德斯鸠.1995.罗马盛衰原因论[M].婉玲,译.北京:商务印书馆. 被引量:1
  • 10孟德斯鸠..论法的精神 上[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.

二级参考文献95

  • 1施特劳斯.《自然权利与历史》,北京:三联书店,2003年,第84,86,92,92-93,122-123页. 被引量:10
  • 2涂尔干.《道德教育》,上海:上海人民出版社,2006年,第360-361页. 被引量:3
  • 3涂尔干,爱弥尔,李鲁宁,赵立玮,付德根译.《孟德斯鸠与卢梭》.上海:上海人民出版社,2003. 被引量:3
  • 4涂尔干.《职业伦理与公民道德》,渠东,付德根译,上海:上海人民出版社,2006年,第238页. 被引量:2
  • 5洛克.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,中译本见《人类理解论》,关文运译,北京:商务印书馆,1983年,第80页. 被引量:3
  • 6涂尔干.2003/1898,《乱伦禁忌及其起源》.汲喆等译.上海:上海人民出版社. 被引量:8
  • 7涂尔干,《宗教生活的基本形式》,渠东等译,上海:上海人民出版社,1999. 被引量:16
  • 8托克维尔.《论美国的民主》,董果良译,北京:商务印书馆,1988年,第450页. 被引量:25
  • 9涂尔干.2000,《社会分工论》,渠敬东译,北京:三联书店. 被引量:17
  • 10罗桑瓦龙,皮埃尔,2012,《法兰西政治模式》,高振华译,北京:三联书店. 被引量:2

共引文献165

同被引文献167

引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部