期刊文献+

第二代面板单位根检验方法有限样本性质的比较研究 被引量:3

A Comparative Research for Finite-sample Properties of the Second Generation of Panel Unit Root Tests
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了克服第一代面板单位根检验方法因忽略截面相关性而导致结论出现显著偏差的问题,第二代面板单位根检验方法应运而生,并在近年来成为跨国(跨区域)研究的重要分析工具。然而,迄今为止,学术界仍鲜有对此方法的有限样本性质展开系统性的比较与分析,鉴于此,本文通过数据生成过程(DGP),结合Monte Carlo模拟对最新提出的第二代面板单位根检验方法的的检验功效、过度拒绝等问题展开比较研究,并在此基础上进一步考察它们在近似单位根、结构性变化和非线性转变等情形下的有限样本性质,最后,基于本文模拟分析结论,提出对未来面板非平稳研究具有实际指导意义的若干建议。 Since first generation panel unit root tests do not take account of cross-sec- tional independence, conclusions based on these tests may be biased. To overcome these limi- tations, second generation panel unit root tests have been recently proposed. However, there is lack of systemic investigation on finite-sample properties of second generation tests. In light of this, this paper employs Monte Carlo simulations to examine the power and over-rejection properties of second generation tests, and further analyze their finite-sample properties when near unit root, structure changes and nonlinear characteristics exist. At last this paper puts forward to some advice for future nonstationary panel analysis.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期124-141,共18页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71273286) 全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(201103) 新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-0546) 教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助重点项目(13JHQ010) 教育部社科重大课题攻关项目(11JZD022) 广东省自然科学基金项目(S2013010012485) 广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金的资助
关键词 MONTE Carlo模拟结构性变化非线性 Monte Carlo SimulatioN Structure Change Nonlinearity
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Afonso A. , Rauh C. , 2010, What do We Really Know about Fiscal Sustainability in the EU? A Panel Data Diagnostic [J]. Review of World Economics, 125 (4), 731-755. 被引量:1
  • 2Balcilar M. , Ozdemir Z. A. , Cakan E. , 2011, On the Nonlinear Causality between Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the G3 Countries [J]. Journal of Applied Economics, 14 (2), 269-296. 被引量:1
  • 3Basher S. A. , Westerlund J. , 2008, Is There Really a Unit Root in the Inflation Rate? More Evi- dence from Panel Data Models [J]. Applied Economics Letters, 15 (3), 161-164. 被引量:1
  • 4Breitung J. , 2000, The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data [J]. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161-178. 被引量:1
  • 5Choi I. , 2001, Unit Root Tests for Panel Data [J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20 (2), 249-272. 被引量:1
  • 6Choi I. , 2006, Combination Unit Root Tests for Cross-sectionally Correlated Panels [A]. In Cor- bae D. , Durlauf S. , Hansen B. , Econometric Theory and Practice : Frontiers of Analysis and Applied Re- search [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 311-333. 被引量:1
  • 7DedeogluD. , Kaya H., 2013, Energy Use, Exports, Imports and GDP: New Evidence from the OECD Countries [J]. Energy Policy, 57 (3), 469-476. 被引量:1
  • 8Elliott G., Rothenberg T., Stock J., 1996, Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root [J]. Econometrica, 64 (4), 813836. 被引量:1
  • 9Gengenbach C. , Palm F. C. , Urbain J. P. , 2010, Panel Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Cross- sectional Dependences : Comparison and Implications for Modelling [J]. Econometric Reviews, 29 ( 2 ), 111-145. 被引量:1
  • 10Im K. S. , Pesaran M. H. , 2003, On the Panel Unit Root Tests Using Nonlinear Instrumental Variables [R]. University of Cambridge, Mimeo. 被引量:1

二级参考文献61

共引文献42

同被引文献55

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部