期刊文献+

环境规制与政府投入的创新效应研究 被引量:2

A Study on Innovation Effect of Environmental Regulation and Government Input
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章利用35个行业的面板数据,研究在环境规制趋严的背景下,能否通过增大政府投入的方式促进企业创新,并比较了研发前后政府投入对企业创新的作用差异。实证检验表明环境规制对企业创新的作用为U型,若在环境规制存在时增加政府投入,可以显著地促进企业创新。污染密集型行业在环境规制下增加政府投入对企业创新的作用系数为正,但不够显著,清洁生产型行业在研发前后的政府投入均存在较为显著的创新作用。据此,文章提出促进我国企业创新的政策建议。 Using the panel data of 35 Chinese industries, the paper makes a study on whether it can promote enterprise inno- vation by increasing government input in the context of more and more stringent environmental regulation, and compares the differences in innovation effects of government input before and after R&D. The empirical test shows that the effect of environ- mental regulation on enterprise innovation is U-shaped curve. It can signifieantly promote enterprise innovation by increasing government input in the presence of environmental regulation. The effect of increasing government input on enterprise innova- tion of pollution-intensive industries is positive, but not significantly. However, government input has a significant innova- tion effect on cleaner production oriented industries before and 'after R&D. The paper makes some poliey suggestions based on the study.
作者 孙伟 江三良
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期106-111,共6页 East China Economic Management
基金 安徽省教育厅人文社会科学重点项目(SK2014A207) 安徽省教育厅2014年高校优秀青年人才支持计划 安徽省社科联项目(A2015067)
关键词 环境规制 企业创新 政府投入 environmental regulation enterprise innovation government input
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Porter M E, Linde V. Toward a New Conception of the Envi- ronmental-Competitiveness Relationship [J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995,9(4) : 97-118. 被引量:1
  • 2Mohr R D. Technical Change, External Economies and the Porter Hypothesis [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002,43 ( 1 ) : 158-168. 被引量:1
  • 3Murty M N, Kumar S. Win-Win Opportunities and Environ- mental Regulation: Testing of Porter Hypothesis for Indian Manufacturing Industries[J]. Journal of Environmental Man- agement, 2003,67(2) : 139-144. 被引量:1
  • 4Beaumont N J, Tinch R. Abatement Cost Curves: A Viable Management Tool for Enabling the Aehievement of Win- Win Waste Reduction Strategies? [J]. Journal of Environ- mental Management, 2004,71 (3) : 207-215. 被引量:1
  • 5Cerin P. Bringing Economic Opportunity into Line with En- vironmental Influence: A Discussion on The Coase Theo- rem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis [J]. Eco- logical Economics, 2006,56(2) : 209-225. 被引量:1
  • 6Kuosmanen T, Bijsterbosch N, Dellink R. Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Timing Strategies in Greenhouse Gas Abatement: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68 (6) : 1633- 1642. 被引量:1
  • 7Jaffe A B, Peterson S R, Portney P R, et al. Environmental Regulation and the competitiveness of U. S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? [J]. Journal of Economics Literature, 1995,33 : 132-163. 被引量:1
  • 8Palmer K, Oates W E, Porterney P R. Tightening Environ- ment Regulation Standard: The Benefit-Cost or the Non- Cost Paradigm? [J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4) : 119-132. 被引量:1
  • 9Brunnermeier S B, Cohen M A. Determinants of Environmen- tal Innovation in US Manufacturing Industries [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 45 : 278-293. 被引量:1
  • 10Alpay E, Buccola S, Kerkvlie J. Productivity Growth and Environmental Regulation in Mexican and U.S. Food Manu- facturing[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2002,84(4) :887-901. 被引量:1

二级参考文献262

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部