期刊文献+

改良的保留神经根治性前列腺癌切除术30例 被引量:12

Effect of the modified nerve-sparing technique in open antegrade radical prostatectomy for 30 patients with prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良的保留神经根治性前列腺癌切除术的临床疗效。方法30例前列腺癌患者采用改良根治性保留神经的前列腺切除术。改良的关键点:采用注水分离前列腺周围筋膜的方法,将Veil保留神经技术应用于开放手术中(即改良Veil保留神经技术);扩大分区(9区5组)盆腔淋巴结清扫;完整保留膀胱颈;集束捆扎背深静脉复合体;跳针套叠技术行膀胱与尿道的吻合。术后行控尿及勃起功能国际问卷-5(IIEF-5)随访。结果患者平均年龄62岁,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平平均11.9ng/ml,手术时间平均150min(75-240min),术中出血量平均350ml(100—1600m1),术前IIEF-5评分平均为21分,病理分期pT18例、pT2a 15例、pT2b4例、pT3a3例。Gleason评分5分2例、6分7例、7分20例、8分1例。手术切缘阳性4例,其中2例为T2期,占T2期的10.5%(2/19),2例为T3期。无围手术期严重并发症。平均随访19个月(6~48个月),术后1个月完全控尿27例(90%),3个月达100%。术后3个月和6个月IIEF-5评分分别为13、19分,分别恢复到术前水平的40%和70%。结论对选择性的前列腺癌患者,改良的保留神经根治性前列腺切除术较完整保留了前列腺周围所有的筋膜神经,使术后控尿及性功能得到早期、快速恢复,切缘阳性发生率低,疗效可靠。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the modified nerve-sparing open antegrade retropubic radical prostatectomy (MNS-ORP). Methods MNS-ORPs were performed in 30 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The modified technique included: endopelvic fascia was not incised, the prostate capsule was freed laterally from surrounding fasciae and dorsally; using the method of separating the peripheral fascia of the prostate, the Veil technique was applied to the open operation, that is, the modified Veil perserving nerve technology; pelvic lymph node dissections (9 regions and 5 groups) were extended; bladder neck preservation was completed; deep dorsal vein complex was bunched; jumper intussusception technology was applied for bladder and urethral anastomosis. Functional outcomes of continence and sexual function (IIEF-score) were followed-up. Results Median age of patients was 62 years old, and the level of PSA was 11.9 ng/ml. Median operating time was 150 minutes (75-240 minutes), blood loss was 350 ml (100- 1 600 ml), preoperative IIEF-score was 21 scores (15-25 scores). Pathologic stage included pT1 (8 cases), pT2a (15 cases), pT2b (4 cases) and pT3a (3 cases). By Gleason score, there were 2 cases of 5 scores, 7 cases of 6 scores, 20 cases of 7 scores and 1 case of 8 scores. 4 cases had positive margins including 2 cases (10.5 %) of pT2 and 2 cases (67 %) of pT3. There were no postoperative complications. Mean follow-up was 19 months (6-48 months). At the 1st month, 27 patients (90 %) got full continence, and at the 3rd month, all of the patients had full continence. At the 3rd month and the 6th month, median IIEF-scores were 13 and 19 scores, respectively with baseline of IIEF-score reaching by 40 % (at the 3rd month) and 70 % (at the 6th month) of preoperative level. Conclusions MNS-ORP follows rationales of radical prostatectomy and might be considered for selected patients. Preserving all periprostatic fasciae/nerves can recover e
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2015年第10期680-682,686,共4页 Cancer Research and Clinic
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 前列腺切除术 保留神经 控尿 性功能 Prostate neoplasms Prostatectomy Nerve sparing Urinary continence Sexual function
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Garcia F J, Violette PD, Brock GB, et al. Predictive factors for return of erectile function in robotic radical prostatectomy : case series from a single centre [J]. Int J Impot Res, 2015, 27 ( 1 ) : 29-32. 被引量:1
  • 2Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the 'Veil of Aphrodite' technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing [J]. Eur Urol, 2006, 49 ( 6 ) : 1065-1073. 被引量:1
  • 3WalzJ, BurnettAL, CostelloAJ, etal. Acriticalanalysisofthe current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 57 ( 2 ) : 179-192. 被引量:1
  • 4Tanaka K, Shigemura K, Hinata N, et al. Histological evaluation of nerve sparing technique in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy [J]. Indian J Urol, 2014, 30 ( 3 ) : 268-272. 被引量:1
  • 5Miyake H, Behnsawy HM, Hinata N, et al. Objective assessment of residual nerve tissues in radical pmstatectomy specimens by immunohistochemical staining of neuronal nitric oxide synthase- positive nerves and its impact on postoperative erectile function [J]. Urology, 2014, 84 ( 6 ) : 1395-1401. 被引量:1
  • 6朱再生,叶敏,施红旗,周一波,陈良佑,刘全启,孙鹏,胡洋,张春霆.前列腺癌淋巴结转移的特点及其临床意义[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2014,35(11):829-832. 被引量:15
  • 7Sung W, Lee S, Park YK, et al. Neuroanatomical study of periprostatic nerve distributions using human cadaver prostate [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2010, 25 ( 5 ) : 608-612. 被引量:1
  • 8Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study [J]. Urology, 2005, 66(6 ) : 1261-1265. 被引量:1
  • 9Nyarangi-Dix JN, Radtke JP, Hadaschik B, et al. Impact of complete bladder neck preservation on urinary continence, quality of life and surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a randomized, controlled, single blind trial [J]. J Urol, 2013,189 ( 3 ) : 891-898. 被引量:1
  • 10Barr C, Thoulouzan M, Aillet G, et al. Assessing the extirpative quality of a radical prostatectomy technique: categorisation and mapping of technical errors [J]. BJU Int, 2014, 114 ( 4 ) : 522-531. 被引量:1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Kryvenko ON, Gupta NS, Virani N, et al. Gleason score 7 ade- noearcinoma of the prostate with lymph node metastases: analysis of 184 radical prostateetmny specimens [ J ]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013, 137: 610-617. 被引量:1
  • 2Chen MK, Luo Y, Zhang H, et al. Laparoseopie radical prosta- teetmny plus extended lymph nodes disseetion for eases with non- extra node metastatic prostate eaneer: 5-year experience in a sin- gle Chinese institution [ J]. J Caneer Res Clin Oneol,2013,139: 871-878. 被引量:1
  • 3Tollefsn MK, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ, et al. The impact of clini- cal stage on prostate cancer survival following radical prostatecto- my []]. J Urol, 2013, 189: 1707-1712. 被引量:1
  • 4Osmonov K, Boller A, Aksenov A, et al. Intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients. Clinical significance of extended lymphadcnectomy [J]. Urologe A, 2013, 52: 240-245. 被引量:1
  • 5Abdollah F, Suardi N, Gallina A, et al. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: a 20-year audit in a single center [J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24: 1459-1466. 被引量:1
  • 6La Rochelle JC, Amlin$ CL. Role of Lymphadenectomy for pros- tate cancer: indications and controversies [ J]. Urol Clin Noah Am, 2011, 38: 387-395. 被引量:1
  • 7Godoy G, Chong KT, Cronin A, et al. Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection and the impact of standard template dissection on nomogram prediction of lymph node involvement [ J]. Eur Urol, 2011, 60: 195-199. 被引量:1
  • 8Heidenreich A, Varga Z, yon Knobloch R. Extended pelvic Iymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy:high incidence of lymph nodes metastasis [ J ]. J Uro|, 2002, 167: 1681-1686. 被引量:1
  • 9那彦群,孙颖浩.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南[M]//那彦群,叶章群,孙颖浩,等,2014版中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:61-89. 被引量:5
  • 10Godoy G, van Badman C, Chade DC, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency and distribution of nodal metastases in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series [ J ]. J Urol, 2012, 187: 2082-2086. 被引量:1

共引文献14

同被引文献55

引证文献12

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部