期刊文献+

不同类型社区居民特征与居民通勤碳排放的关系 被引量:1

Relationship Between Residents′ Features of Different Types of Communities and Commuting Carbon Emissions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探究居民特征对居民通勤碳排放分布的影响,对西安市不同类型的8个社区进行了居民出行调查。通过计算居民的通勤碳排放和统计各类居民个人特征,分析了各社区内产生通勤碳排放较高的居民组成。研究结果表明:本科学历、公司职员、41~50岁是最可能产生高碳排放的居民特征,但在不同类型的社区中分布情况有明显差异;同类型的社区,距离市中心越远,居民越可能产生高碳排放,但高碳排群体的特征与社区位置无关;不同类型社区对应不同类型的居民群体,而具有相似特征的居民的出行选择也较为相近,使得碳排放的分布与居民特征密切相关。 In order to discover the influence of residents′ features on commuting carbon emissions, atravel survey aiming at 8 communities of different types was performed. Residents′ commuting carbonemissions were calculated, and individual features were classified to analyze characters of high carbonemission residents. The results show that bachelor degree, company employee, and 41 to 50 years old arefeatures of residents who have the highest possibilities to produce high commuting carbon emissions,while their distribution in different types of communities have obvious difference. It′s found that amongthe communities of same type, the further it is from city center, the higher commuting carbon emissionsits residents may produce, while the features of high commuting carbon emissions group have nothing todo with community location. All the research indicates that different types of communities correspond todifferent types of residents, and residents with similar features make similar travel choices, which makesa close relationship between distribution of commuting carbon emissions and residents′ features.
作者 黄欣然
出处 《交通运输研究》 2015年第5期44-53,共10页 Transport Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51178055-E0807)
关键词 通勤出行 碳排放 社区 出行调查 统计分析 commuting travel carbon emission community travel survey statistical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1《中国统计年鉴-2014》编委会.中闲统计年鉴-2014[Z].北京:中国统计出版社,2014. 被引量:1
  • 2Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, In- ternational Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2009[R]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Develop- ment, 2009. 被引量:1
  • 3European Environment Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Projections in Europe 2003[M]. Copenhagen: Of- fice fir Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 4MEYER M, MILLER E. Urban Transportation Planning[M]. New York: McGraw-tfill Science/Engineering/Math, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 5徐建闽.我国低碳交通分析及推进措施[J].城市观察,2010(4):13-20. 被引量:28
  • 6NICOLAS J, DAVID D. Passenger Transport and Carbon Emissions: What Does the French Transport Survey Tell Us? [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2009(43): 1015-1020. 被引量:1
  • 7KO J, PARK D, LIM H, HWANG I. Who Produces the Most Carbon Emissions for Trips in the Seoul Metropolis Area?[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2011, 16(5): 358-364. 被引量:1
  • 8Buchs M, SCHNEPF S. Who Emits Most? Associations Be- tween Socio-Economie Factors and UK Households' Home Energy, Transport, Indirect and Total Carbon Emissions[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013, 90(C): 114-123. 被引量:1
  • 9肖作鹏,柴彦威,刘志林.北京市居民家庭日常出行碳排放的量化分布与影响因素[J].城市发展研究,2011,18(9):104-112. 被引量:34
  • 10刘沛,杜宁睿,黄经南,等.基于社区尺度的城市空间参数对家庭日常出行碳排放的影响研究[C]//多元与包容--2012中闷城市规划年会论文集(06.住房建设与社区规划).昆明:云南科学技术出版社,2012. 被引量:1

二级参考文献41

  • 1耿志民,季令.城市交通拥挤问题探讨[J].铁道运输与经济,2006,28(2):22-23. 被引量:9
  • 2IPCC.2006.2006年IPCC国家温室气体清单指南[M].神奈川:日本全球环境战略研究所. 被引量:5
  • 3Ko J, Park D, Lima H, et al. Who produces the most CO2 emissions for trips in the Seoul metropolis area? [ J ]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2011,16(5) :358 -364. 被引量:1
  • 4McNamara D, Caulfield B. Measuring the potential implications of introducing a cap and share scheme in Ireland to reduce green house gas emissions [ J ]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18 (4) : 579 -586. 被引量:1
  • 5Shammin M R, Bullard C W. Impact of cap - and - trade policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions on U. S. households [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68 ( 8 - 9 ) :2432 - 2438. 被引量:1
  • 6Wallace A A, Irvine K N, Wright A J, et al. Public attitudes to personal carbon allowances : findings from a mixed - method study [J]. Climate Policy, 2010,10(4) :385 -409. 被引量:1
  • 7Wadud Z. Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins? [ J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2010,In Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Wadud Z, Nolandc R B, Grahamc D J. Equity analysis of personal tradable carbon permits for the road transport sector [ J ]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2008,11 (6) :533 - 544. 被引量:1
  • 9Bristow A L, Wardman M, Zanni A M, et al. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(9) :1824 - 1837. 被引量:1
  • 10Matthew B, Carrie M, George S. Integrating a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model into ATMIS Transportation Modeling Frameworks [Z]. 2001. 被引量:1

共引文献60

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部