摘要
目的通过比较针刺颈穴与传统耳周穴两种方法对颈性耳鸣症状及伴随症状的影响,探索治疗耳鸣的方法。方法用手法对40例颈性耳鸣患者的颈穴或耳周穴进行针刺治疗,观察耳鸣及伴随症状的转归情况。结果 40例患者中,有效26例,14例无效。针刺颈穴组有效16例,针刺传统耳周穴组有效10例低于颈穴组且2种方法比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。针刺颈穴与传统耳周穴对颈性耳鸣的伴随症状有不同程度的改善。结论针刺颈穴改善颈部肌肉的挛缩状态,可以减轻对椎基底动脉的压迫或对交感神经的刺激,对治疗颈性耳鸣及其相关伴随症状的效果优于针刺传统耳周穴。
Objective To analyze the clinical comparison between the neck acupoints acupuncture treatment and traditional acupuncture treatment of cervical tinnitus .Methods All 40 patients were divided into the neck acupoints acupuncture group and traditional acupuncture group ,and then we observed the effect after treatments .Results Among the 40 patients ,26 patients were cured ,and 14 patients were invalided by treatments .The neck acupoints acupuncture treatment group cured 16 patients ,which were higher than the traditional acupuncture treatment group and there was a significant difference between two treatment groups （ P〈0 .05 ） .The symptoms along with cervical tinnitus had improved in some extent .Conclusion The neck acupoints acupuncture treatment could improve the state of neck muscles spasticity ;relieve the oppression of verte-bra basilar artery and the stimulation of sympathetic nerve .It was better to treat cervical tinnitus and its associated symptoms than traditional acupuncture .
出处
《吉林中医药》
2015年第9期955-958,共4页
Jilin Journal of Chinese Medicine
基金
辽宁省科学技术计划项目(200822500)
关键词
针刺
颈穴
传统耳周穴
颈性耳鸣
acupuncture
neck acupoints
traditional acupoints
cervical tinnitus
