摘要
法人概念最初为私法中的概念,公法中的法人概念系对民法中法人概念的借用,但二者指称的意义不同。私法与公法中两个指称意义不相同的法人概念并存,导致包括法人概念本身所具有的指称价值的丧失、法人概念体系化的矛盾和困难等体系构建上的问题。坚持法人概念的私法性在现行理论和制度体系之下更具可行性、更符合法律人格的相对性理论,应坚持法人概念私法性并在此前提下实现法律主体概念的体系化。
The concept of juristic person is defined in the civil law initially. The meaning of juristic person in the pub- lic law which derived from civil law is different from its original meaning. The exiting of two different concepts of juristic person in law lead to lots of problem, including the loss of referential value of juristic person, the conflicts and difficulties in the building of legal concept system, and etc. The concept of juristic person should be defined in civil law because it is more feasible, more in line with the theory of the relativity of legal personality. We should adhere to the concept of juristic person in civil law and implement the systemization of the concept of legal subjects.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期95-105,共11页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
法人
公法
私法
本源
法律概念
juristic person
public law
civil law
origin
legal concept
