期刊文献+

美国麻醉医师协会分级在老年肝癌患者外科治疗风险评估中的作用 被引量:138

Use of ASA grade in surgical risk estimation for the elderly patients with liver cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级在老年肝癌患者外科治疗风险评估中的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2012年4月期间我院收治且经病理检查确诊的老年肝癌患者556例,根据术后住院期间并发症发生情况分为并发症组和无并发症组。对2组患者临床病理指标和手术情况进行比较,并对相关风险因素进行多因素回归分析。结果多因素分析显示ASA分级(OR=2.228,P<0.01)、年龄(OR=1.582,P=0.034)、输红细胞(OR=2.277,P<0.01)和肝硬化(OR=1.910,P=0.01)是老年肝癌患者术后并发症发生的独立影响因素。ASA分级、Child-Pugh(CTP)分级和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的受试者工作曲线(ROC)下面积分别为0.637(P<0.01),0.605(P<0.01),0.558(P=0.076)。结论在老年肝癌肝切除手术中ASA分级可以作为早期预测的指标来帮助外科医生评估围手术期风险。 Objective To assess the value of ASA grade in risk estimation for the elderly patients with liver cancer.Methods 556 elderly patients diagnosed definitely as liver cancer were enrolled from January 2004 to April 2012 in our hospital. The patients were divided into the complication group and non-complication group according to the occurrence of postoperative complications during hospital day. Furthermore,operative parameters of patients were compared in two groups,and independent impact factors for postoperative complications were identified by multiple regression analysis.Results ASA grade was related to postoperative complications,patients with a higher ASA grade had a more risk of postoperative complications. The age( OR = 1. 582,P = 0. 034),red blood cell transfusion( OR = 2. 277,P 〈 0. 01),ASA grade( OR = 2. 228,P 〈 0. 01) and liver cirrhosis( OR = 1. 910,P = 0. 01) and liver cirrhosis were the independent impact factors for postoperative complications by multivariate regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that ASA grade was superior to CTP and MELD in predicting postoperative outcomes. Conclusions ASA grade is a better index for early estimation of the perioperative risk for the elderly patients with cancer.
作者 李响
出处 《实用老年医学》 CAS 2015年第9期755-758,共4页 Practical Geriatrics
关键词 美国麻醉医师协会分级 肝癌 围手术期 老年人 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification liver cancer perioperative aged
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Sutton R, Bann S, Brooks M, et al. The Surgical Risk Scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit [J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89(6) : 763-768. 被引量:1
  • 2Copeland GP, Jones D, Waiters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit [J~. Br J Surg, 1991, 78(3):355-360. 被引量:1
  • 3Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer I-I, et al. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome [J]. B J Anaesth, 1996, 77(2) : 217-222. 被引量:1
  • 4杨秉辉,任正刚.老年肝癌的诊治进展[J].实用老年医学,2001,15(3):123-124. 被引量:3
  • 5刘晓峰,姚立农,柴伟,梁峰,杨永慧.不同麻醉方法对老年骨科手术患者应激反应的影响[J].实用老年医学,2006,20(5):309-311. 被引量:11
  • 6Fitch JC, Singleton MA. American Society of Anesthesiologists on Children's Surgical Care [ J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 219(2): 326. 被引量:1
  • 7Miller TJ, Jeong HS, Davis K, et al. Evaluation of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification system in risk assessment for plastic and reconstructive surgery patients [ J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2014, 34(3) : 448-456. 被引量:1
  • 8Tan WP, Talbott VA, Leong QQ, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists class and Charlson's eomorbidity index as predictors of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leak: a single-institution experience [ J ]. J Surg Res, 2013, 184 (1) : 115-119. 被引量:1
  • 9Enestvedt BK, Eisen GM, Holub J, et al. Is the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification useful in risk stratification for endoscopic procedures? [ J ]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 77(3): 464-471. 被引量:1
  • 10Djaladat H, Bruins HM, Miranda G, et al. The association of preoperative serum albumin level and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score on early complications and survival of patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder cancer [ J]. BJU Int, 2014, 113 (6) : 887-893. 被引量:1

二级参考文献6

共引文献12

同被引文献1398

引证文献138

二级引证文献571

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部