期刊文献+

在低卵巢储备患者中灵活的促性腺激素拮抗剂方案优于标准拮抗剂方案 被引量:6

Flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol is superior to the standard Gn RH-A protocol in patients with diminished ovarian reserve in IVF-ET
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估灵活、低剂量促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(Gn RH-A)方案和标准的Gn RH-A方案在卵巢储备功能减退患者体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)/卵胞质单精子注射(ICSI)的超促排卵过程中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析108例卵巢储备功能减退患者IVF-ET周期,其中58例使用灵活而低剂量Gn RH-A方案(A组),50例使用标准Gn RH-A方案(B组)。比较各组实验室指标和临床结局。结果:A组Gn RH-A使用天数、剂量均少于B组(P<0.05);A组h CG注射日E2峰值、优质胚胎数、新鲜胚胎移植周期临床妊娠率、累积临床妊娠率均高于B组(P<0.05);但促排卵天数、Gn用量、内膜厚度、获卵数、成熟卵数、受精率、新鲜胚胎移植周期移植胚胎数、冻融胚胎移植周期临床妊娠率、累积着床率组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:与标准Gn RH-A方案相比,灵活而低剂量的Gn RH-A使用方案可获得更多的优质胚胎并降低Gn RH-A的使用总剂量和天数,提高累积临床妊娠率和胚胎着床率。 Objective: To evaluate the application of flexible gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-A) and the standard GnRH-A protocol in patients with diminished ovarian reserve in IVF-ET. Methods: Clinical data of 108 patients undergoing IVF were retrospectively analyzed. Among them 58 patients were allocated to the flexible GnRH-A (group A) and 50 patients to the standard GnRH-A protocol (group B). The laboratory indexes and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Duration and dosage of GnRH-A in group A were lower than that in group B. The E2 level on hCG injection day, No. of good-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate per fresh embryo transfer cycle, accumulative pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in group A were higher than those in group B (P〈0.05). No significant differences were observed in ovarian stimulation days, Gn used dosage, endometrial thickness, No. of oocytes retrieved and mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, No. of transferred embryos in fresh ET cycle, clinical pregnancy rate per frozen-thawed embryos transfer cycle, accumulative implantation rate between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion: Compared with standard GnRH-A protocol, there are more higher-quality embryos in the flexible GnRH-A protocol than those in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. At the same time, there are lower duration and dosage of GnRH-A in the flexible GnRH-A protocol compared with the standard GnRH-A protocol. Moreover, the clinical pregnancy of the flexible GnRH-A protocol were improved compared with the standard GnRH-A protocol.
出处 《生殖与避孕》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期601-605,共5页 Reproduction and Contraception
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 项目号:No.81200421
关键词 体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF—ET) 促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRH—A) 卵巢低反应 累积妊娠率 IVF-ET GnRH-A diminished ovarian reserve accumulative pregnancy rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, et al. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91(3):749-66. 被引量:1
  • 2Sunkara SK, Coomarasamy A, Faris R, et al. Long gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist vs. short agonist vs. antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(2):147-53. 被引量:1
  • 3陈智勤,潘家坪,滕晓明.微刺激方案在常规IVF-ET治疗失败后卵巢低反应患者中的应用[J].生殖与避孕,2012,32(7):464-469. 被引量:26
  • 4Huang SY, Huang HY, Yu HT, et al. Low-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is as effective as the long GnRH agonist protocol in unselected patients undergoing in vitro fertiliza- tion and embryo transfer. Taiwan Residents J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 50(7):432-5. 被引量:1
  • 5Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, et al. ESHRE working group on poor ovarian response definition. ESHRE consen- sus on the definition of "poor response" to ovarian stimula- tion for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(5): 1616-24. 被引量:1
  • 6Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, et al. The cumulative embryoscore: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod, 1992, 7(1): 117-9. 被引量:1
  • 7S6nmezer M, Iltemir Duvan C, Ozmen B, et al. Outcomes after early or midfollicular phase LH supplementation in previous inadequate re sponders. Reprod B iomed Online, 2010, 20(3): 350-7. 被引量:1
  • 8Esinler I. Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who un- derwent ICSI. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 41 (4):384-8. 被引量:1
  • 9Serour GI. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online, 2008, 17(Suppl 3):34-8. 被引量:1
  • 10Cakmak H, Tran ND, Zamah AM, et al. A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antago- nist improves outcomes in poor responders. Fertil Steril,2014,101(5):1308-14. 被引量:1

二级参考文献28

  • 1赵旭,刘平,刘鹏博(编校).控制超排卵中的卵巢低反应[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(8):1150-1153. 被引量:12
  • 2刘嘉茵.微刺激方案治疗卵巢低反应IVF周期[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(3):134-135. 被引量:20
  • 3Oktem O,Mercan R,Balaban B.Comparison of IVF outcomesbetween GnRH antagonistand GnRH agonist long protocolsin normo responder IVF patients.Korean J Fertil Steril,2010,94(5):315-24. 被引量:1
  • 4Kurzawa R,Ciepiela P,Baczkowski T,et al.Comparison ofembryological and clinical outcome in GnRH antagonist vs.GnRH agonist protocols for in vitro fertilization in PCOSnon-obese patients.A prospective randomized study.J As-sist Reprod Genet,2008,25(8):365-74. 被引量:1
  • 5Steer CV,Mills CL,Tan SL,et al.The cumulative embryoscore:a predictive embryo scoring technique to select theoptimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertili-zation and embryo transfer programme.Hum Reprod,1992,7(1):117-9. 被引量:1
  • 6Barmat LI,Chantilis SJ,Hurst BS,et al.A randomizedprospective trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone(GnRH)antagonist/recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone(rFSH)versus GnRH-agonist/rFSH in women pretreated withoral contraceptives before in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril,2005,83(2):21-30. 被引量:1
  • 7Bendikson K,Milki AA,Speck-Zulak A,et al.Comparisonof GnRH antagonist cycles with and without oral contra-ceptive pretreatment in potential poor prognosis patients.Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol,2006,33(3):145-7. 被引量:1
  • 8Pinkas H,Sapir O,Avrech OM,et al.The effect of oralcontraceptive pill for cycle scheduling prior to GnRH-an-tagonist protocol on IVF cycle parameters and pregnancyoutcome.Assist Reprod Genet,2008,25(1):29-33. 被引量:1
  • 9Kolibianakis EM,Papanikolaou EG,Camus M,et al.Effectof oral contraceptive pill pretreatment on ongoing pregnancyrates in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonists and re-combinant FSH for IVF.A randomized controlled trial.HumReprod,2005,21(2):352-7. 被引量:1
  • 10Griesinger G,Venetis CA,Marx T,et al.Oral contraceptivepill pretreatment in ovarian stimulation with GnRH antago-nists for IVF:a systematic review and meta-analysis.FertilSteril,2008,90(4):1055-63. 被引量:1

共引文献33

同被引文献41

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部