期刊文献+

中国量刑规范化之十年检讨与展望 被引量:34

Ten- year Review and Prospect of Chinese Standardization of Sentencing
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国量刑规范化自列为重大司法改革项目后,在期待与质疑中推进了十年。期间经过了从过去"部分法院初步试点-全国法院全面试点-全国法院全面试行"到当前"全国法院全面施行"的发展历程。理性检讨这十年的探索实践,其既取得了将量刑纳入庭审程序、全面提取和适用量刑情节、真正改变"轻量刑"观念等革命性成就,也存在实体规则的设置违背刑法基本原理、理论依据的借鉴存在致命误区、意见规则的适用与法典法律适用相冲突、程序规则的设置不能与实体法对接等僵局性问题。展望未来,量刑规范化的规则设置及其实践运行,需坚守刑法及其法律适用的基本原理和量刑的基本运行规律,变量刑运行中的精确数量化为模糊裁量。 Since being listed as the important Judicial Reform Project, Chinese standardization of sentencing has been conducting in anticipation and query for ten years. During the ten - year period, the standardization of sentencing has slipped from the past "the initial pilot of the part courts - comprehensive pilot of the national courts - full trial of the national courts" to the present "full implementation of the national courts". After making a rational review of the exploration of ten years, it can be found that the standardization of sentencing has achieved revolutionary achievements, including bringing the sentencing into the trial procedure, completely extracting and applying the circumstances of sentencing and really changing the concept of contempt of sentencing. On the other hand, there are also some rigid problems in the standardization of sentencing, including substantive rules violating the principle of criminal law, rationale having some fatal misunderstanding, application of the rules of standardization sentencing running counter to the application of code of law and procedural rules being inconsistent with substantive law. Looking to the future, the setting of rules and practice operation of the standardization of sentencing should stick to the basic principle of criminal law and application of the criminal law and the basic operation rules of sentencing, and change the precision quantification to the fuzzy discretion in the operation of sentencing.
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期170-180,共11页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 中国法学会部级法学研究课题青年项目(CLS(2012)Y37):量刑规范化的优化路径研究 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(201104315):量刑规范化的理论论证与优化路径研究
关键词 量刑规范化 僵局性问题 量刑运行规律 模糊裁量 standardization of sentencing rigid problems the operation rules of sentencing fuzzy discretion
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1戴长林,程士华.量刑规范化改革在全国法院全面试行[EB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet.com/legal/2010-10/08/c-12638650.htm.2010-10-08/2015-05-01. 被引量:1
  • 2最高人民法院量刑规范化项目组.《人民法院量刑指导意见》与"两高三部"《关于规范量刑程序若干问题的意见》理解与适用[M].北京:法律出版社,2010. 被引量:1
  • 3最高人民法院量刑规范化项目组.《量刑规范化改革-内容与解读》(内部资料)[z].最高人民法院量刑规范化项目组印,2009. 被引量:1
  • 4陈学勇.最高法院调研全国12个试点法院量刑规范化工作[N].人民法院报,2009-02-28(04). 被引量:1
  • 5南英主编..量刑规范化实务手册[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:411.
  • 6李本森.量刑规范化改革的"三点论"-以美国的量刑改革为参照[M]//.量刑研究(第一卷).北京:法律出版社,2014. 被引量:1
  • 7刘远,汤建国.量刑规范化理论探索:"全国量刑规范化学术研讨会"论文集[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010. 被引量:1
  • 8蔡道通."精确制导",真的可以吗?[M]//.量刑规范化理论探索:"全国量刑规范化学术研讨会"论文集.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010. 被引量:1
  • 9虞平.量刑与刑的量化——兼论“电脑量刑”[J].法学家,2007(2):62-69. 被引量:34
  • 10汪贻飞.中国式“量刑指南”能走多远——以美国联邦量刑指南的命运为参照的分析[J].政法论坛,2010,28(6):108-120. 被引量:24

二级参考文献190

共引文献1276

同被引文献520

引证文献34

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部