期刊文献+

供应链企业间知识交易的关系契约机制:基于合作创新的研究视角 被引量:15

A study on the relational contract of knowledge trading among members in the supply chain based on the perspective of cooperative innovation
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于供应链合作创新视角,知识交易双方投入要素的无法验证性所引起的双边道德风险往往会阻碍知识交易的顺利进行。针对上述问题,运用委托代理理论设计了双边道德风险下供应链企业间知识交易的正式契约及关系契约激励机制。研究表明,双边道德风险下知识交易的正式契约无法有效激励交易双方共同投入;对于任意贴现因子,实施关系契约的知识交易量与供应链创新收益产出均不小于正式契约,且随着贴现因子的增大,关系契约的激励效果越显著;当贴现因子达到一定门槛值时,关系契约能有效激励交易双方投入及供应链创新收益产出达到最优。最后,通过数值算例验证了相关结论的有效性。 Based on the perspective of cooperative innovation in the supply chain, the double moral hazard in knowledge trading among members resulted by the intangibility and unveritlability of their resources input will hinder the smooth progress of knowl- edge trading. Aiming at the above - mentioned problem, formal contract and relational contract of knowledge trading are designed with principal -agent theory, and then the incentive effects of contracts are analyzed. The conclusions indicate that the formal contract cannot motivate their contribution in knowledge trading effectively; the transfer quantity of knowledge trading and innova- tion income of supply chain under the relational contract are not less than that under the formal contract for all discount rate; the incentive effectiveness of the relational contract is getting more obvious with the increase of discount rate. When the discount rate reaches a certain threshold value, the optimal resources input and innovation income can be achieved through relational contract. At last, the effectiveness of the conclusions is verified through numerical examples.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期38-48,共11页 Science Research Management
基金 国家社会科学基金项目:关系和信任导向下供应链企业间知识共享的创新效应与实现机制研究(项目编号:13CGL013 起止时间:2013.06-2015.12) 国家自然科学基金项目:知识密集型服务外包中的知识共享激励与知识资产争端协调机制研究(项目编号:71301182 起止时间:2013.09-2016.12) 重庆市教委科学技术研究项目:合作创新视角下供应链企业间知识共享的治理机制及其实证研究(项目编号:KJ131003 起止时间:2013.06-2015.12)
关键词 供应链 知识交易 合作创新 正式契约 关系契约 supply chain knowledge trading cooperative innovation formal contract relational contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Mihm J.Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing[J].Management Science.2010,56(8):1324-1344. 被引量:1
  • 2Cao M,Zhang Q.Supply chain collaboration:Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance[J].Journal of Operations Management.2011,29(3):163-180. 被引量:1
  • 3潘文安.关系强度、知识整合能力与供应链知识效率转移研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(1):147-153. 被引量:54
  • 4Davenport T H,Prusak L.Working knowledge[M].Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998,87-114. 被引量:1
  • 5Ba S,Stallaert J,Whinston A B.Optimal investment in knowledge within a firm using a market mechanism[J].Management Science.2001,47(9):1203-1219. 被引量:1
  • 6Matson E,Patiath P,Shavers T.Stimulating knowledge sharing:Strengthening your organization's internal knowledge market[J].Organizational Dynamics.2003,32(3):275-285. 被引量:1
  • 7Desouza K C,Yamakawa S,Awazu Y.Pricing organizational knowledge:An imperative[J].Ivey Business Journal,2003,67(7):1-5. 被引量:1
  • 8Desouza K C,Awazu Y.Markets in know-how[J].Business Strategy Review.2004,15(3):59-65. 被引量:1
  • 9Desouza K C,Awazu Y,Yamakawa S.Facilitating knowledge management through market mechanism[J].Knowledge and Process Management.2005,12(2):99-107. 被引量:1
  • 10Brydon M,Aidan R.Understanding the failure of internal knowledge markets:A framework for diagnosis and improvement[J].Journal of Information & Management.2006,8(1):964-974. 被引量:1

二级参考文献207

共引文献368

同被引文献174

引证文献15

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部