摘要
学界通过"四说"与其说是对知识产权法定主义原则合理性的论证,不如说是对知识产权私权合理性的论证。表演者权入法的历史、表演者权私权的本质、表演产品的特性决定了其法定主义原则的选择的合理性。严格法定主义原则可能会导致司法僵化是伪问题。及时修法、谨慎设置兜底条款,竞争法保护模式,为表演者法益的保护开辟了创造性司法之路,从而有效缓解知识产权体系化过程的所谓的法定主义和僵化性的矛盾。
The academic circles proves the rationality of intellectual property through ＂ the four existed theories ＂ ,instead of a provement on IP legalism,better to call it a provement on IP as private right.IP legalism is determined by the rationality of performers right in history ,nature of performers right as private right,performance product.It is a pseudo problem that the strict legal doctrine may lead to judicial fossilization. Timely changing law, carefully setting the transparency provisions, competition law protection mode, has opened up a creative judicial road for the protection of performers of legal interests, so as to effectively ease the contradiction between the legal doctrine of intellectual property system process and rigid.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2015年第6期67-72,共6页
Electronics Intellectual Property
基金
中国法学会2014年自建项目的阶段性成果之一。项目编号:CLS(2014)D006
关键词
法定主义
表演者权
创造性司法
体系化
Intellectual Property legalism
performers right
the creative adjudication
systematization
