摘要
目的:探讨踝关节骨折切开复位内固定后下胫腓联合分离固定和未固定的疗效对比情况。方法:选取收治的36例踝关节骨折患者临床资料,依据固定措施不同进行分组,固定组18例和未固定组18例。结果:两组踝关节骨折患者TBCS、TBOL和Baird-Jackson踝关节功能评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者踝关节临床治疗的优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:踝关节骨折切开复位内固定后下胫腓联合分离固定和未固定治疗均有较好的临床疗效,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To approach curative effect paired observation of ankle fractures reduction and internal fixation under tibial joint separation by immobilization and unsecured. Method The clinical data of 36 cases of ankle fractures was selected, which was to be divided in- to two groups,immobilization group 18 cases and unsecured group 18 cases. Results The TBCS,TBOL and Baird- Jackson ankle function score of two groups ankle fractures patients were no difference （ P 〉 0. 05 ）, the fine rate of clinical treatment of two groups ankle fractures pa- tients were no difference （ P 〉 0. 05 ）. Conclusion The curative effect paired observation of ankle fractures reduction and internal fixation un- der tibial joint separation by immobilization and unsecured should are better,which is to be used.
出处
《吉林医学》
CAS
2015年第15期3233-3234,共2页
Jilin Medical Journal
关键词
踝关节骨折
复位内固定
下胫腓联合分离
固定
未固定
疗效
Ankle fractures
Reduction and internal fixation
Under tibial joint separation
Immobilization
Unsecured
Curative effect
