摘要
"社会法庭"制度具有效益、自治和"接近正义"的现实合理性。但是"社会法庭"这一概念的提出,既有误解、难免误读,其置于全面推进依法治国战略的当下,法理依据仍显薄弱,难以解答"司法职业"与"社会自治""严格司法"与"合乎情理""程序正义"与"个案公平""标本意义"与"推广价值"的逻辑悖论。研究认为,"社会法庭"在观念上并非一个科学稳妥的提法,应尽快将其纳入法院调解或者人民调解的制度框架,实务中注重发挥仲裁、律师代理和法律援助的积极作用,达到国家城镇化与法治现代化的和谐共进。
h is undeniable that the＂community tribunal＂ pilot system by the High court of Henan province is of realistic ration- ality in efficiency, self - governance and ＂access to justice＂. The concept of ＂community tribunal＂, however, may be misinterpre- ted and misunderstood. Nowadays, as the ＂rule by law＂ strategy is being comprehensively promoted,its legal basis seems to be weak, and it gives no solutions to the logical paradoxes between ＂judicial profession＂ and ＂community self- governance＂ ,＂ ab- solute justice＂ and ＂discretion＂,＂ procedural justice＂ and ＂case - to - case fairness＂, as well as between ＂exemplary signifi- cance＂ and ＂promotional value＂. This paper argues that ＂community tribunal＂ is not a scientific or well -advised concept, and should be incorporated into the institutional framework of court mediation or people＇s mediation. In practice, the positive effects of arbitration, attorney and legal aid be emphasized, to achieve harmony between the national urbanization and the modernization of law.
出处
《学术探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第7期58-62,共5页
Academic Exploration
基金
2013年度国家级大学生创新创业训练计划资助项目(201310476064)
关键词
社会法庭
司法制度
法理悖论
改革
进路
community tribunal
judicial system
paradox of law theory
reform
path forward
