期刊文献+

三种体位固定技术在盆腔肿瘤放疗中的应用比较 被引量:24

Compare the application of the three positioning methods in tumor of pelvis radiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较3种体位固定术在盆腔肿瘤患者放疗中的摆位误差,探讨盆腔肿瘤患者放疗的理想体位,为临床提供参考。方法选取2013-09-01-2014-03-31山东省肿瘤医院放疗科收治的需要进行精确放疗的盆腔肿瘤患者45例,根据固定技术不同分为真空垫、低温热塑体膜和碳纤维腹板3组,每组各15例,每组患者均行放疗前的锥形束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)扫描,进行CBCT与计划CT图像在线配准,获取摆位误差,收集数据,采用SPSS19.0软件进行统计分析。结果真空垫组患者摆位误差依次为X(2.9±1.64)mm,Y(3.1±1.73)mm,Z(4.5±1.60)mm;热塑体膜组依次为X(3.4±2.10)mm,Y(3.3±2.32)mm,Z(1.8±1.08)mm;碳纤维腹板组依次为X(2.3±1.33)mm,Y(1.6±0.83)mm,Z(2.1±1.30)mm。经过单项方差分析和LSD方法多重比较发现,X方向,3组比较差异均无统计学意义,P值均>0.05;Y方向,真空垫组和低温热塑体膜组差异无统计学意义,但两者均大于碳纤维腹板组,P值均<0.05;Z方向,低温热塑体膜组和碳纤维腹板组差异无统计学意义,但两者均小于真空垫组,P值均<0.05。结论 3种体位固定方式在盆腔肿瘤的放疗中尽管都能起到一定的固定作用,但从摆位误差结果分析来看,碳纤维腹板的固定效果最好,低温热塑体膜次之。 OBJECTIVE To compare the setup errors of the three positioning methods in tumor of pelvis radiotherapy and research the ideal position for pelvic tumor patients in radiotherapy,to provide certain reference value for clinicians.METHODS Totally 45 cases of pelvic tumor patients who need precise radiotherapy in Shandong Cancer Hospital radiotherapy department from 2013-09-01 to 2014-03-31 were divided into three groups in a fixed way according to the different fixation techniques,agroup of 15 cases with negative pressure vacuum bags,another group of 15 with low-temperature thermoplastic sheets,the other group of 15 cases with carbon fiber belly boards.Patients in each group were performed CBCT scanning before radiotherapy.The CBCT and planning CT images were matching online,and then the positioning errors were measured and analyzed.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19 software.RESULTS The set-up errors(mm)of the vacuum bag,namely the systemic±random errors were X(2.9±1.64),Y(3.1±1.73),Z(4.5±1.60).Thermoplastic sheet group were X(3.4±2.10),Y(3.3±2.32),Z(1.8±1.08).Belly board group were X(2.3±1.33),Y(1.6±0.83),Z(2.1±1.30).The single variance analysis and LSD multiple comparison method showed,X:3groups had no significant difference;Y:There was no significant difference between the vacuum bag and sheet,but the two were greater than the belly board(P〈0.05);Z:There was no significant difference between sheet and belly board,but two of them were less than vacuum bag(P〈0.05).CONCLUSIONS The three positioning methods have advantages and disadvantages respectively in tumor of pelvis radiotherapy.But from the setup errors of the results,the fixed effect of carbon fiber belly board is the best,and thermoplastic sheet is the second.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第12期974-977,983,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 盆腔肿瘤 放射治疗 真空垫 热塑体膜 碳纤维腹板 pelvis neoplasms radiotherapy negative pressure vacuum bag thermoplastic sheet carbon fiber belly board
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1葛琴,吴建亭,谢国栋.胸部肿瘤放射治疗两种体位固定技术摆位误差比较研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2012,19(18):1424-1426. 被引量:29
  • 2Szabo Zv Agoston P.Major T.et al. Comparison of CT-and MRIbased clinical target volumes for 3-dimensional conformal external-be am radiotherapy of prostate cancer[J]. Magy Onkol , 2012.56(4):266-272. 被引量:1
  • 3Nielsen M. Bertelsen A ? WestbergJ ? et al. Cone beam CT evaluation of patient set-up accuracy as a QA tool[J]. Acta Oncol , 2009.48(2):272-276. 被引量:1
  • 4Kataria Tv Abhishek Av Chadha P.et al. Set-up uncertainties: online correction with X-ray volume imaging.J Cancer Res Ther , 2011. 7 (1) :41-45. 被引量:1
  • 5Tolan SI. Kong V. Rose wall T. et al. Patient-specific PTV margins in radiotherapy for bladder cancer-feasibility study using cone beam CT[J]. Radiother Oncol.2011.99(2) :131-136. 被引量:1
  • 6VanasekJ. Odrazka K. Dolezel M. Searching for an appropriate image-guided radiotherapy method in prostate cancer-implications for safety margin] I]. Tumori.2014.100(5) :518-523. 被引量:1
  • 7袁响林,熊慧华,于世英,熊华.俯卧位腹部托板用于直肠癌术后辅助性放疗的剂量学研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(5):400-402. 被引量:4
  • 8SamuelianJM. Callister MD. AshmanJB. et al. Reduced acute bowel toxicity in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for rectal cancer[J]. IntJ Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys , 2012. 82(5): 1982-1986. 被引量:1
  • 9王巍,刘冉生,庄洪卿,袁智勇,赵路军,王平.肺癌放疗中胸部热塑体膜与负压真空气垫固定摆位误差比较[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(3):235-236. 被引量:23
  • 10VanasekJ,Odrazka Kv Dolezel M. Searching for an appropriate image-guided radiotherapy method in prostate cancer-implications for safety margin[J]. Tumori , 2014.100(5) :518-523. 被引量:1

二级参考文献38

  • 1姚原,吴国华,林清,夏士安,钱咏梅,舒忠梅.CT模拟定位对肺癌三维适形放疗的影响[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(3):213-214. 被引量:11
  • 2钱立庭,金大伟,刘新帆,李晔雄,宋永文,余子豪.直肠癌术后辅助性放疗不同照射技术的剂量学研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(6):483-486. 被引量:51
  • 3金晶,李晔雄,王绿化.Ⅱ~Ⅲ期可切除直肠癌的综合治疗[J].癌症进展,2006,4(3):225-234. 被引量:10
  • 4刘跃平,刘新帆,李晔雄,李涛.盆腔肿瘤三维适形放疗摆位重复性研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):313-316. 被引量:44
  • 5王绿化,张红星,陈东福.肺癌//殷蔚伯,余子豪,徐国镇,等.主编.肿瘤放射治疗学.4版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008:578-611. 被引量:9
  • 6James HV, Scrase CD, Poynter AJ. Practical experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol,2004,77:3-14. 被引量:1
  • 7Liu HH, Wang X, Dong L, et al. Feasibility of sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 58 : 1268-1279. 被引量:1
  • 8De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Nestle U, et al. European organisation for research and treatment of cancer recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol,2010,28:5301-5310. 被引量:1
  • 9Worm ES, Hansen AT, Petersen JB, et al. Inter-and intrafractional localisation errors in cone-beam CT guidedstereotactic radiation therapy of tumors in the liver andlung. Acta Oncol, 2010,49: 1177-1183. 被引量:1
  • 10Schwarz M, Van der Geer J, Van Herk M, et al. Impact ofgeometrical uncertainties on 3DCRT and IMRT dose distributions for lung cancer treatment. Int J Radiat OncolBiol Phys,2006,65: 1260-1269. 被引量:1

共引文献68

同被引文献193

引证文献24

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部