摘要
目的比较不同病原学方法检查蠕形螨的效果,分析相关影响因素,提高蠕形螨的检出率。方法应用挤粘法、透明胶纸粘贴法对同一人群进行蠕形螨检查。结果挤粘法与透明胶纸粘贴法蠕形螨检出率分别为39.28%、21.72%,二者间差异有统计学意义(χ2=24.43,P<0.01)。结论挤粘法的检出率优于透明胶纸粘贴法。
Objective To compare two different methods for pathogenic diagnosis of demodex and analyze on relative factors in order to increase detection rate of demodex. Methods Two methods were used to detect demodexmite infection in the same group of people. Results The infection rate of demodex was 39.28% and 21. 72%, respectively by squeezing and cellophane tape method and transparent adhesive tape method, which was of statistical differences（x^2 =24.43, P〈0.01）. Conclusion The detection rate of squeezing and cellophane tape method was higher than that of transparent adhesive tape method.
出处
《青岛医药卫生》
2015年第3期172-173,共2页
Qingdao Medical Journal
基金
2014年度河南省高等教育教学改革研究项目(编号:2014SJGLX137)
关键词
人体蠕形螨
挤粘法
透明胶纸粘贴法
Human demodex
Squeezing and cellophane tape method
Transparent adhesive tape method
