摘要
1924年5月,北京大学"校花"韩权华在《晨报副刊》控诉北京大学教授杨栋林诱惑女生,道德败坏,对男女共同教育产生恶劣影响。此事迅速在公众之中引起强烈反响,并引发媒体持续关注。如何看待杨栋林向女生冒昧写情书的行为?又如何看待此事对男女同校产生的影响?众声喧哗的背后,其实展现了公众在社交公开、自由恋爱等问题上的不同理解和性别立场。在当时的校园环境下,社交公开与自由恋爱只不过是"纸上谈兵",礼教的思维方式与评价标准仍然影响着绝大多数人的生活。
In May 1924, Peking University ＂campus Belle＂ Han Quan-hua went on Morning Supplement to accuse Peking University Professor, Yang Dong-lin, of seducing female students, being morally corrupted, and having bad effects on Coeducation. This accusa- tion rapidly caused strong repercussions in the public, and attracted the media＇s attention. Questions were raised regarding how to view Yang Dong-lin＇s love letters to a female student, and how to judge the impact of this event on Coeducation？ Behind the Hubbub, what actually showed was the different understanding and gendered views of the ＇Free Social Intercourse＇, and ＇Free Love＇. At the time of the campus environment, Free Social Intercourse and Free Love were only an existence ＂on paper.＂ Traditional ways of thinking and stan- dards of propriety still affect most people＇s lives.
出处
《妇女研究论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期66-74,85,共10页
Journal of Chinese Women＇s Studies
关键词
性别立场
情书
男女同校
社交公开
师生恋
gender standpoint
love letters
coeducation
free social intercourse
teacher and student romance
