摘要
新刑事诉讼法移植了英美法系的"排除合理怀疑"证明标准,并将其作为"证据确实充分"证明标准的组成部分。然而,"证据确实充分"的证明标准仍然以"融贯论"作为"真实"的标准,有未肃清的客观真实情结。融贯只是案件事实"真实"的必要条件,而非充分必要条件。"排除合理怀疑"与"证据确实充分"在真理观和价值观方面大异其趣。我国证明标准应从"融贯论"标准向"真"之信念观、从价值中立向道德责任、从实证主义向社会构建论转变。
'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' is integrated into the standard of 'unquestionable and sufficient evidences' in the revised cirminal procedural law.But we set up Coherentism as the standard of case facts.This is a complex of uncleared objective truth.Coherence is requirement of truth of case facts,not necessary and sufficient condition.The standard of beyond reasonable doubt is very different from that of unquestionable and sufficient evidences in the respect of the view of truth and values.We should turn Coherence Theory of Truth to the belief idea of truthlikeness,change value neutrality into moral responsibility notion,convert positivism into social constructionalism concept.
出处
《科技与法律》
2015年第3期594-609,共16页
Science Technology and Law
关键词
证据确实充分
融贯论
实证主义
社会构建论
排除合理怀疑
Unquestionable and Sufficient Evidences
Coherentism
Positivism
Social Constructionalism
Beyond Reasonable Doubt
