摘要
自由主义者往往认为国家权力与私人权利之间是一种零和关系上的博弈,只有政府干预的减少才会使公民的权利得以扩大。这种以个人主义为基础的自由主义观仅仅关注到了权利的可欲性问题,却忽视了权利的可行性问题。霍尔姆斯、桑斯坦从研究权利所依赖的成本入手,提出了一种具有公共属性的权利观,认为政府权力与个人权利之间并不是此消彼长的零和关系,政府干预的减少必然导致公民的权利得不到有效的保障,要想将纸面上的权利或道德权利变为切实可行的法律权利,必须依赖于以公共财政为支撑的警署、法院等国家机构。如此,公民个人所享有的私权利,便不可避免地带有公共属性的色彩。
the Liberals tend to think that between state power and the private right is a kind of zero sum game relationship, only the reduction of government intervention wiU make the rights of citizens to expand. This is based on individualism liberalism of view only pay attention to the right to be a problem, but ignored the feasibility problem of rights. Holmes, Sunstein rely on research from the cost of rights to start, put forward a kind of have a common property rights concept, be- lieve that all rights are positive rights, between state power and individual rights is not the shift in the zero sum relation- ship, the reduction of government intervention will inevitably lead to civil rights can not be protected effectively. To be on paper right or moral right into legal right feasible, must rely on to public finance to support the police, judges and other government agencies. So, individual citizens enjoy the private right, is inevitable with the public attribute of color.
出处
《理论与现代化》
CSSCI
2015年第3期18-23,共6页
Theory and Modernization
关键词
权利
公共属性
积极权利
公共财政
公共责任
right
public property
positive right
public finance
public responsibility
