期刊文献+

安全禁止标志识别率与标志特征关系研究 被引量:6

RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF SAFETY PROHIBITION SIGNS RECOGNITION RATE AND SIGN FEATURES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高安全标志有效性,需要对安全标志五维特征与标志识别率关系进行研究。选取50名安徽工程大学在校学生为试验对象,40个禁止安全标志为试验材料,研究安全标志的五维特征与标志识别率的关系,建立安全标志识别率与标志五维特征的多元线性回归方程模型。结果表明:标志的熟悉性对标志识别率影响最大,其后依次为简明性、具体性、语义相关性、明确性。此外,回归模型中,常数项为正值,说明仍有其他因素影响标志识别率,有待进一步研究发现。 In order to improve safety signs’ effectiveness, the relationship of safety sign recognition rate and five sign features should be studied. To perform the experiments, 50 college students from Anhui Polytechnic University were selected as subjects, 40 prohibition signs used in the experimental. We establish a multiple linear regression equation model based on the relationship of safety sign recognition rate and five sign features. The results show that the familiarity of safety sign has the most significant impact on the recognition rate, followed by simplicity, concreteness, semantic closeness, meaningfulness. In addition, the constant term is positive in the regression model which indicates that there are some other factors affect sign recognition rates. It is necessary that the influencing factors of safety signs’ effectiveness should be studied in further research.
出处 《井冈山大学学报(自然科学版)》 2015年第2期69-73,共5页 Journal of Jinggangshan University (Natural Science)
基金 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1308085MG109) 国家级大学生创新创业训练项目(201310363026)
关键词 安全标志 识别率 标志特征 多元线性回归 safety signs recognition rate sign features multiple linear regressions
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献35

  • 1GB2894-2008安全标志及其使用导则[S]. 被引量:11
  • 2[1]侯德藻.道路交通标志视认性研究可行性研究报告[R].北京:[出版者不详],2005:11-12. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]交通部公路科学研究院.公路交通标志视认性及设置有效性研究可行性研究报告[R].北京:[出版者不详],2004:27-28. 被引量:1
  • 4[6]汪安圣.认知心理学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1997:166-167. 被引量:1
  • 5[7]靳尔刚,中国地名[EB/OL].(1996-04-22) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Journal/F-F4-NAME-1996-02.htm. 被引量:1
  • 6[8]郝黎仁.SPSS 实用统计分析[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2002:223-231. 被引量:1
  • 7Wogalter M S,Conzola V C.Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation [J].Ap.Ergo.,2002,33 (3):219-230. 被引量:1
  • 8Leonard S D.Does color of warning affect risk perception? [J].Indus.Ergo.,1999,23 (11):499-504. 被引量:1
  • 9Silver N C,Wogalter M S.Strength and understanding of signal words by elementary and middle school students,Proc.of the HFES.35th An.Meeting,San Francisco,CA,1991. 被引量:1
  • 10Young S L.Connotation of hazard for signal words and their associated panels [J].Ap.Ergo.,1997,29 (2):101-110. 被引量:1

共引文献125

同被引文献63

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部