摘要
目的为了确定五种基本情绪体验期间心脏变时性功能维度的自主神经传出活动模式。方法对92名女大学生和女研究生,采用6个影片片段来诱导悲伤、厌恶、愤怒、恐惧和快乐五种基本情绪和一种中性状态,用“情绪报告表”采集被试产生的情绪及其等级,并且记录心率变异性(HRV)高频功率和低频功率。结果⑴悲伤、厌恶、愤怒的低频功率和高频功率呈显著负相关(P<0.01;P<0.001;P<0.001);快乐、恐惧、中性片段的低频功率和高频功率之间不相关(P>0.05);⑵每一种情绪的自主神经反应都包含多种模式,以拮抗模式和共同活动模式为主;⑶悲伤情绪和中性状态以经典拮抗模式为最多(30.3%;32.5%);厌恶和快乐情绪以副交感神经活动增强伴随交感神经活动减弱的拮抗模式最多(30.2%;33.3%);愤怒和恐惧情绪主要表现经典拮抗模式和共同激活模式(31.2%;30.3%),二者比例接近。结论每一种情绪的自主神经反应模式都不仅仅限于经典拮抗模式,还可以有副交感神经活动增强伴随交感神经活动减弱的拮抗模式、共同激活模式、共同抑制模式以及四种非伴随活动模式。不同情绪在各种反应模式的分布上不同。
Objective To determine cardiac autonomic outflow pattern in five basic emotions. Methods With elicitation of sadness, disgust, anger, fear, happiness as well as the neutral state by film segments, this study resorted to adjective checklist to determine emotion self-report categories and their grades, and recorded high frequency （HF） and low frequency （LF） of heart rate variability. Results There was significant negative correlation between HF and LF in sadness, disgust, and anger（ P〈0. 004; P〈0.001 ; P〈0.001 ） ; there was no correlation between high frequency and low frequency in happiness, fear, and neutral statement （ P 〉 0. 05 ） ; autonomic response pattern in each emotion is variable, reeiprocal pattern and coactivation pattern were central; the traditional reciprocal pattern was central in sadness and neutral statement （30.3% ;32.5% ） ; reciprocal parasympathetic activation pattern was central in disgust and happiness （30.2% ;33.3% ） ; traditional reciprocal pattern and coactivation pattern were central in anger and fear（31.2% ;30.3% ）. Conclusion Autonomic response patterns in each emotion are not confined in unique pattern of traditional reciprocal sympathetic activation and distributions of all kinds of response patterns among emotions are observed differently.
出处
《中国行为医学科学》
CSCD
2006年第1期57-58,共2页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
