摘要
因为人对自身的任何关系都通过人对他人的关系得到实现和表现,所以劳动异化能够过渡到人同人相异化、交往异化和社会联系异化。《手稿》异化劳动的前三个规定与第四个规定——"人同人相异化",与《穆勒评注》中的交往异化和社会联系异化,都遵从同一个异化逻辑。异化的主体既可以是"孤立人",也可以是两人或多人关系及其承载物。异化劳动和私有财产是阐释交往异化、社会联系异化的根源性概念。"社会联系异化"比"交往异化"能更准确地概括《穆勒评注》的主题。
Because every relationship in which man stands to himself is implemented and expressed by the relationship in which a man stands to other men, the alienated labor can transit to the interpersonal alienation, the alienation of communication and the alienation of social connection. The first three provisions of the alienated labor in The First Manuscript have the same theoretical logic as the fourth provision, interpersonal alienation, the alienation of communication and the alienation of social connection. The subject of alienation can be an isolated man, also can be two or more people＇ relationship and its carrying. The theory＇ narration of alienation is the deduction from abstract to concrete. The alienated labor and private property is the root concepts to interpret the alienation of communication and the alienation of social connection. The alienation of social connection can more accurately summarize the theme of Karl Marx＇ s Mill Notes than the alienation of communication.
出处
《北京行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期73-78,共6页
Journal of Beijing administration institute
关键词
异化劳动
异化逻辑
人同人相异化
交往异化
社会联系异化
alienated labor
logic of alienation
interpersonal alienation
the alienation of communication
the alienation of social connection.
