摘要
从表面上看,马克思在《穆勒评注》中的确不再强调劳资对立,而是关注起个人与个人之间的交换关系,但这并不代表其学术路径的根本转移或变化,而只是由于他此时所摘录的内容仅限于交换关系而不是三大阶级的分配关系的矛盾性而已。综合马克思在这一文本中对作为人的外化的类活动的货币、人的社会本质与单个人的关系、人的自我异化与相互异化的关系等问题的阐述,不难看出,《穆勒评注》与《1844年经济学—哲学手稿》的"第一手稿"之间,并没有根本性的思想差异。
Karl Marx＇ s focus in＂ Notes on J. Mill＂ is not the contradiction between labor and capital, the exchange between privates. Anyway, it doesn＇t mean that his academic route has been changed, because it only bases on the change of Marx＇s notes, which has been changed to the exchange relations. If we judge this text comprehensively from Marx＇ s understanding of money as the alienation of human activity, the ralations between human＇s social essence and individual, the relations between alienation of human itself and inter - alienation of human beings, it will not be difficult for us to see that there is no such kind of essential difference between the first manuscript of＂ 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manu- script＂ and＂ Notes on J. Mill＂.
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期26-30,共5页
Hebei Academic Journal
关键词
穆勒评注
马克思
交换
Notes on J. Mill
Karl Marx
exchange
