期刊文献+

从美国终身教职后评审制反思我国高校教师评价制 被引量:2

Reflecting the University Teacher Evaluation in China Based on Post-tenure Review in the United States
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国终身教职后评审制度是指大学教师获得终身教职后,定期接受的关于教学、科研、服务等业绩的考核评审。美国终身教职后评审重视教师的发展,强调同行评价的作用,评价方式多样化,评价标准灵活多变。比照美国的终身教职后评审制度,我国高校教师的评价制度仍存在着一些问题,应引起我们在高校教师评价的主体、评价标准及评价最终目的等方面的反思。 Post-tenure Review refers the system that university teachers regularly receive reviews about their performances in teaching,scientific research and service, etc. after having been granted tenure. With diversified evaluation methods and flexible evaluation standard, Post-tenure Review focuses on the development of the teachers and emphasizes the role of peer evaluation. While comparing with it, there are still some problems existing in China's University Teacher Evaluation. It is worth our reflection in regard to the main body of evaluation, evaluation criteria and ultimate purposes, etc.
作者 徐发秀
出处 《广西青年干部学院学报》 2014年第5期72-74,共3页 Journal of Guangxi Youth Leaders College
关键词 美国 终身教职后评审制 高校教师评价制 反思 the United States Post-tenure Review University Teacher Evaluation reflect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1AAUP.Post-tenure review:An AAUP response.Academe,1998,84,(5):61. 被引量:1
  • 2Jeffery PAper,Judith E Fry.Post-tenure Review at Graduate Institutions in the United States.The Journal of Higher Education,2003,74,(3):241. 被引量:1
  • 3Cheryl Sternman Rule.Chapter 6,After the Big Decision:Post-tenure Review Analyzed.Cathy A.Trower (Ed.).Policies on Faculty Appointment-Standard Practices and Unusual Arrangements.Bolton,MA:Anker Publishing,Inc.,2000. 被引量:1
  • 4C.M.Licata,J.C.Morreale,.Post-tenure Faculty Review and Renewal:Experienced Voices.New Pathways Project.Washington,DC:American Association of Higher Education.2002. 被引量:1
  • 5Clint Johnson,Michael Kelley.Educators' forum:Pro Ductivity and Competence Post-tenure Review in American Universities.Issues in Accounting Education,1998,13,(3):747. 被引量:1
  • 6Madeleine J Goodman.The Review of Tenured Faculty.The Journal of Higher Education,1990,61,(4):408. 被引量:1
  • 7Mary W Gray,Warner Lawson Jr,Margaret Klayton Mi,Joan Wallach Scott.Academic Freedom and Tenure:Virginia State University.Academe,2005,91,(3):.47. 被引量:1
  • 8C.M.Licata.Post-tenure Review:At the Crossroads of Accountability and Opportunity.AAHE Bulletin,1998,50,(10):3. 被引量:1
  • 9the University of North Carolina Committee to Study Post-tenure Review.Post-tenure Review in the University of North Carolina.1997.http://www.northcarolina.edu/content.php/aa/tenure/reports/report.html 被引量:1
  • 10Donna R.Euben.Tenure:Current Perspectives and Challenges.2002.http://www.aaup.org/Legal/info%20outlines/legtenur.htm 被引量:1

共引文献13

同被引文献1

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部