摘要
目的观察加用柴芍承气汤综合心理干预治疗急性胰腺炎的临床疗效。方法按照随机数字表法将119例患者分为观察组(61例)和对照组(58例)。对照组患者采用常规治疗,观察组患者在对照组基础上结合柴芍承气汤联合综合心理干预治疗。对比两组治疗后疗效、心理干预后患者满意率、临床症状及体征恢复时间、住院时间及并发症发生情况。结果观察组总有效率为81.97%,心理干预后患者满意率为96.72%,显著高于对照组的63.79和81.03%(P<0.05);观察组患者腹胀、血清淀粉酶、胃痛恢复正常时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者并发症发生率比较,无统计学差异(19.67%比22.41%,P>0.05)。结论柴芍承气汤联合心理干预治疗急性胰腺炎临床疗效显著,患者满意度高,可明显缩短临床症状及体征恢复正常时间和住院时间。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of comprehensive psychological intervention by adding Chaishaochengqi Decoctionon in treating acute pancreatitis. Methods According to the random number table,119 patients with acute pancreatitis were divided into the observation group ( n=61) and control group ( n=58). The control group adopted the conventional treatment,while on this basis the observation group was given Chaishaochengqi Decoction combined with psychological intervention. The efficacy after treatment,patient satisfaction rate after the psychological intervention,recovery time of clinical symptoms and signs,hospitalization time and occurrence sit-uation of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 81. 97%and the patient satisfaction rate after psychological intervention was 96. 72% ,which were significantly higher than 63. 79% and 81. 03% in the control group( P 〈 0. 05);the recovery time of abdominal distension,the hospitalization time,serum amylase and stomach pain in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group( P 〈 0. 05);the incidence of complications had no statistically significant difference between the two groups( P 〉0. 05). Conclusion Chaishaochengqi Decoction combined with the psychological intervention has significantly clinical effect and high patient satisfaction rate in treating acute pancreatitis,which can sig-nificantly shorten the hospital stay and recovery time of clinical symptoms and signs.
出处
《中国药业》
CAS
2015年第8期103-104,共2页
China Pharmaceuticals
关键词
柴芍承气汤
急性胰腺炎
心理干预
疗效
Chaishaochengqi Decoction
acute pancreatitis
psychological intervention
curative efficacy