摘要
法治指数评估在我国的兴起既是法治发展自身规律性的表现,也是当前推进我国法治中国建设的重要手段。法治指数评估包括体制性、价值性和综合性三种路径,对法治内涵的不同理解会产生不同的指标体系;德尔菲法是设置法治指标和权重的常用方法,但有一定局限性。法治指数定量分析能否真正代表本地法治发展水平,存在肯定说和否定说两种不同的观点。法治指数本土化要求不能照搬法治指数国际化的标准,须充分考虑我国的法治成长和社会转型的环境。反思法治指数评估理论研究现状,我国未来法治指数评估要充分认识法治指数评估的科学性及其限度,探索建立法治指数本土化模式;要以实践为导向,以问题为标准,在实践中提炼理论,重视法治指数区域化研究,强化法治指数类别化研究,突出法治指数实证研究。
Evaluation of the rule of law index is a need for the development itself, and also is the important means to promote the rule of law in China. Evaluation of the rule of law index mainly includes the system, the value, and the comprehensiveness. Different understanding of the concept of the rule of law results in different indicators systems. Delphi method is a common method for the setting of indicators of the rule of law and indicators weight, but it has some limitations. There exist positive and negative attitudes toward whether the rule of law index quantitative analysis can really represent the local level of the rule of law development. Localization of the rule of law index can not copy the international standards. It should consider the environment of growth of the rule and the social transformation. Rethinking of the evaluation theory of the rule of law index indicates that it is necessary to completely understand the rule of law index evaluation and its limits, to explore the localization pattern for the es- tablishment of the rule of law index, to establish theories according to the empirical studies of the real situation and problems, to pay attention to regional research of the rule of law index, to strengthen the research of the categories of the rule of law index, and to highlight the empirical research of the rule of law index.
出处
《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第3期18-25,共8页
Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
中国司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(14SFB2002)
重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYS14087)
关键词
法治
法治评估
法治指数
the rule of law
the evaluation of the rule of law
the Rule of law index
