期刊文献+

3-T MR扩散加权成像诊断前列腺癌最优b值探究 被引量:9

Investigation of the optimal b value in diffusion weighted MR imaging for diagnosis of prostate cancer at 3-T
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以磁共振超声融合靶向穿刺联合系统穿刺病理结果为金标准,探究3-T MR扩散加权成像(DWI)诊断前列腺癌的最优b值。方法前瞻性招募临床拟诊为前列腺癌的患者43例,于穿刺前行包括常规T2WI及10个b值(0、50、100、150、200、500、800、1 000、1 500、2 000s/mm2)DWI在内的MR检查。采用DWI联合T2WI对病灶进行分析判断,根据MR诊断结果选择穿刺方式。MR提示有可疑病灶者行靶向穿刺联合系统穿刺,未提示可疑灶者行单纯系统穿刺。选择病理确诊为前列腺癌的患者,测量不同b值病灶及正常组织的DWI信号强度。采用Wilcoxon Signed Ranks非参数配对检验分析不同b值病灶和正常组织信号强度差异是否具有统计学意义,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算各b值诊断曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性。结果入组病例共43例,22例确诊为前列腺癌,16例为良性前列腺增生,5例为前列腺炎。在确诊为前列腺癌的22例中,16例病灶在b值为1 500s/mm2 DWI上显示较为清晰,6例病灶在b值为2 000s/mm2 DWI上显示较为清晰。Wilcoxon Signed Ranks结果显示当b值为500s/mm2时病灶和正常组织信号强度差异无统计学意义(P=0.236),在其他b值图像上病灶和正常组织信号强度差异均有统计学意义(P<0.000 1)。ROC曲线分析提示b值为1 500s/mm2时AUC最大(0.933)。当诊断的信号强度cut-off值为49.2时,诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为0.909和0.909。结论3-T MR DWI在b值为1 500s/mm2时具有最佳显示病灶能力,在b值为500s/mm2时无法区分诊断前列腺癌与正常组织。 Objective To investigate the optimal b value in diffusion weighted MR imaging for diagnosis of prostate cancer at 3-T while using magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound(MR/TRUS)fusion-guided biopsy and system biopsy pathological findings as reference standard.Methods Forty-three consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study;they were suspected to have prostate cancer and underwent T2 WI and diffusion-weighted MRI with 10b-values(0,50,100,150,200,500,800,1 000,1 500,and 2 000s/mm^2)prior to biopsy.DWI combined with T2 WI analysis was used for detecting prostate cancer.The biopsy modality was decided by the MRI results:patients had suspicious lesions took MR/TRUS fusionguided biopsy and system biopsy and those had no suspicious lesions took system biopsy only.The signal intensity of prostate cancer lesions and normal prostate tissue on DWI of different b values were measured.Statistical analyses were performed by a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test to compare the signal intensities between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissue.Receiver operating characteristics(ROC)were used to calculate the AUC,sensitivity,and specificity,so as to determine the optimal b value for revealing prostate cancer on DWI.Results Twenty-two of the 43 patients were diagnosed as prostate cancer,with 16 diagnosed as benign prostate hyperplasia(BPH)and 5as prostatitis.Among the 22 prostate cancer patients b=1 500s/mm^2 and b=2 000s/mm^2 DWI images provided the best lesion visibility in 16/22 and in 6/22 patients,respectively.Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test showed that the signal intensities of the lesions and the normal tissues were significantly different(P〈0.000 1)at all b values but when at 500s/mm^2(P=0.236).ROC curve indicated that the optimal signal intensity contrast was obtained at b=1 500s/mm^2(P〈0.000 1,AUC=0.933),and the signal intensity cut-off value was 49.2,with the sensitivity and specificity being 0.909 and 0.909,respectively.Conclusion A b value of 1 500s/mm^2 is optimal for 3-T DWI
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期402-406,共5页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基金 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会项目(M20140149)~~
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 鉴别诊断 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 信号强度 prostatic neoplasms differential diagnosis magnetic resonance imaging diffusion weighted imaging signal intensity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Le J D,Tan N,Shkolyar E,Lu D Y,Kwan L,Marks L S,et al.Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology[J].Eur Urol,2015,67: 569-576. 被引量:1
  • 2Hambrock T,Somford D M,Huisman H J,van Oort I M,Witjes J A,Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C A,et al.Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer[J].Radiology,2011,259:453-461. 被引量:1
  • 3Kim C K,Park S Y,Park J J,Park B K.Diffusion-weighted MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer [J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2014,202:W270-W276. 被引量:1
  • 4Soylu F N,Peng Y,Jiang Y,Wang S,Schmid-Tannwald C,Sethi I,et al.Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging [J].Radiology,2013,267:797-806. 被引量:1
  • 5Radtke J P,Kuru T H,Boxler S,Alt C D,Popeneciu I V,Huettenbrink C,et al.Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance[J].J Urol,2015,193:87-94. 被引量:1
  • 6Kim A Y,Kim C K,Park S Y,Park B K.Diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate for changes from androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer [J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2014,203:W645-W650. 被引量:1
  • 7Decker G,Mürtz P,Gieseke J,Tr?ber F,Block W,Sprinkart A M,et al.Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate: dynamic ADC monitoring by DWI at 3.0 T[J].Radiother Oncol,2014,113:115-120. 被引量:1
  • 8Zelhof B,Pickles M,Liney G,Gibbs P,Rodrigues G,Kraus S,et al.Correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance data with cellularity in prostate cancer [J].BJU Int,2009,103:883-888. 被引量:1
  • 9Lang P,Wendland M F,Saeed M,Gindele A,Rosenau W,Mathur A,et al.Osteogenic sarcoma: noninvasive in vivo assessment of tumor necrosis with diffusion-weighted MR imaging[J].Radiology,1998,206:227-235. 被引量:1
  • 10Jie C,Rongbo L,Ping T.The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis [J].Eur Radiol,2014,24:1929-1941. 被引量:1

同被引文献102

引证文献9

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部