摘要
中国法史及法史学的研究自上世纪初形成以来,在法学界或为炙手可热的"学科",或为可有可无的"冷门"。这种冷热两极现象的背后,反映的是对学术目标的多种误读。比如,盲目地主张"创新",单纯地强调学术服务于"时势",本末倒置地将"学科"完善视为学术的目的等等。正是这种学术目标的误读,导致中国法史研究长期纠缠于方法的争论而忽视基础问题的研究。纠正学术目标误读的方式在于充分认识并尊重学术研究的规律,对基础问题的研究应在"传承"中创新;培养学人的独立品格,逐渐改善人云亦云的学风;将学科视为学术研究的途径而不是目的,以促进而不是桎梏学术研究的发展。
The study of Legal History and Legal Historiography started at the beginning of last century in China. This discipline has been through both the popular and unpopular time in legal scholarship, which manifests the misunderstanding toward academic goal. For instance, advocate innovation in an aimless way, simply stress the service function of academic research toward current affairs and make discipline improvement the academic goal improperly. Such misunderstanding leads to rather than basic issue study in Chinese legal heated and long-term discussion on methods historiography. Therefore, it is significant to rectify academic goal in three aspects. First, it helps to fully understand and respect the law of academic research and innovate based on the academic succession in basic issue study. Second, it could cultivate scholars＇ independent spirit and improve the academic atmosphere. At last, it would stimulate the development approach instead of goal. of academic study if discipline were regarded as
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期220-233,共14页
China Legal Science
