摘要
本文在商榷中指出,当下中国法律史研究面临的主要问题是史学化有余而法学化不足;不应以史学的学术评价标准而应以法学的学术评价标准评价法律史;法学化与西方化是两个不同的问题;应重新认知法学化法律史在法学和法治发展中的重要作用。文章特别重申法律史研究进路应该是法学化而不是史学化,其中法学化进路再构的关键,是法律史研究必须坚守法学学术传统而非史学学术传统。
This paper points that studies of the legal history should take the legal methods in discussion.The main prob- lems of the legal history study is the extension of historical methods and the lack of legal methods. The academic evaluation should not follow the criteria of history, but should follow the criteria of law.The tendency towards legal study and western tra- ditions are two different questions.We should reaffirm the important role of legal history in the development of law and rule of law. The study of the legal history should follow the tendency towards legal study instead of history study.The key to the re construction of the legal study path is that the study of legal history should stick to the academic tradition of the law and not that of history.
出处
《法学评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期171-178,共8页
Law Review
关键词
法律史研究进路
法学化
化学术传统
The Methods About Studies of the Legal History
Law Methods
Historical Methods
Academic Tradition
