摘要
将小耳畸形患者56例(58只耳)随机分为观察组(反复快速扩张法,n=30)和对照组(常规扩张法,n=26),用不同扩张方式扩张耳后乳突区皮肤,观察两种方法临床效果利弊。结果表明观察组术后并发症发生率与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者耳后扩张疼痛计分明显降低(P<0.01)。与对照组比较,观察组平均扩张时间60.67 d,对照组扩张时间90.89 d。两组患者扩张器埋置及扩张时期,并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义。
56 cases of microtia patients （58 ears） were randomly divided into observation group （ improved expan-sion method,30 cases） and control group （ conventional expansion method,26 cases） . After expending the ear mas-toid skin, the clinical characteristics of the two methods were observed. The results showed that there was a signifi-cant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups （ P 〈0. 05 ） . The count scores of expansion pain were significantly lower in the observation group（P〈0. 01）. The average expansion time was 60. 67 days in the observation group compared with 90. 89 days in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complication between the two groups during implantation and expansion of the expand-er.
出处
《安徽医科大学学报》
CAS
北大核心
2015年第4期552-554,共3页
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
关键词
反复快速扩张
皮肤扩张术
小耳再造
repeated rapid skin expansion
skin expansion
auricular reconstruction
