期刊文献+

护士交接班评估量表的汉化及信效度检测 被引量:100

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Nursing Assessment of Shift Report
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 翻译中文版护士交接班评估量表(NASR),并对其进行信度、效度检测。方法遵循Brislin双人翻译与回译原则,利用专家咨询法进行文化调适,形成中文版NASR量表。在130名临床护士调查中评价其信度与效度。结果 中文版NASR量表共有17个条目,因子分析共提取5个因子,累积贡献率为88.420%。该量表Cronbach'sα系数为0.840,各因子Cronbach'sα系数为0.855~0.975,重测信度为0.803,各因子重测信度为0.804~0.950。中文版NASR量表的内容效度(CVI)为0.92,各维度间的相关系数为0.331~0.562,各维度与量表总分之间的相关系数为0.551~0.702,且均有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论 中文版NASR量表具有良好的信效度,可作为护士对交接班效果评估工具,实现护理交接班质量的优质改进。 Objective To translate the English version of Nursing Assessment of Shift Report(NASR) into Chinese, and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of NASR. Methods The NASR was translated and adapted according to Chinese culture. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of NASR was tested in 130 nurses. Results The Chinese version of NASR consisted of 17 items. Five factors were extracted by factor analysis which could explain 88.420% of the total variance. The Cronbach's ot coefficient was 0.840 for the total scale and the Cronbach's o~ coefficient of each factor ranged from 0.855 to 0.975. The test-retest reliability was 0.803 for the total scale and the test-retest reliability of each factor ranged from 0.804 to 0.950. The content validity index was 0.92. The correlation coefficient between each dimension score ranged from 0.331 to 0.562 and the correlation coefficient between each dimension score and the total score ranged from 0.551 to 0.702. Conclusion The Chinese version of NASR is reliable and valid,and can be used to evaluate the shift report of nurses and thereby to improve the quality of shift report.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期404-407,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 护士交接班评估量表 信度 效度 Nursing Assessment of Shift Report Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1sRadtke K.Improving patient satisfaction with nursing communi-cation using bedside shift report[J].Clin Nurse Spec,2013,27 (1):19-25. 被引量:1
  • 2Thomas L,Donohue-Porter P. Blending evidence and innova- tion:improving intershift handoffs in a multihospital setting[J]. J Nurs Care Qual,2012,27(2):116-124. 被引量:1
  • 3Kelly M. Change from an office-based to a walk-around han- dover system[J]. Nurs Times,2005,101 (10) :34-35. 被引量:1
  • 4Cahill J. Patient's perception of bedside handovers[J]. J Clin Nurs, 1998,7(4) :351-359. 被引量:1
  • 5Howell M. Confidentiality during staff reports at the bedsides [Jl. Nursing Time, 1994,90(34) :44-45. 被引量:1
  • 6Sand-Jecklin K,Sherman J. A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation [J]. J Clin Nurs ,2014,10(1 ) : 1-9. 被引量:1
  • 7Sand-Jecklin K,Sherman J. Incorporating bedside report into nursing handoff:evaluation of change in practice[J].J Nurs Care Qua1,2013,28(12) : 186-194. 被引量:1
  • 8郭金玉,李峥,康晓凤.心力衰竭自我护理指数量表的汉化及信效度检测[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(7):653-655. 被引量:107
  • 9尤黎明,吴瑛.内科护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:149-162. 被引量:94
  • 10王晓庆,段培蓓,陈毓雯,张晓琴,李菊云,梅思娟,诸建华.腹部手术患者术后疼痛知识、信念及行为问卷的编制与信效度检验[J].中华现代护理杂志,2012,18(34):4096-4099. 被引量:9

二级参考文献86

共引文献1003

同被引文献680

引证文献100

二级引证文献953

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部